Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Weight or volume measure?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-14-2014 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
TXStr8shot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default Weight or volume measure?

Do you measure your powder by weight or volume?
I use pre measured powder holders and use 73gr Blackhorn 209 which is about 110 gr by volume. I find it is much more consistent shot to shot this way as volume can vary greatly IMHO..
TXStr8shot is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 05:02 AM
  #2  
Spike
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

I weight my BH 209 powder 75grs., more consistent groups.
speedmaster97 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 05:32 AM
  #3  
7.62NATO's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Seems to me that with BH209 weight would work best. Most, if not all other BP subs absorb much more moisture and cannot be weighed effectively.
7.62NATO is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 05:49 AM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, South Dakota
Default

Absolutely nothing wrong with weighing Blackhorn powder. However, my loads i always measure by volume.

110g of Blackhorn is supposed to weigh 77g, so it would seem a weight of 73g would result in a light 110g load. One thing i have noticed, is different lots of Blackhorn do have different densities. When switching to a new container, one may find that the weight-volume ratio changes. It may be one needs to re-establish one's load when opening a new container with a different lot number.

One nice thing about Blackhorn is the size of each granule is very very consistent. This lends itself to accurate measuring by volume. Seems it also lends itself to accurate measuring by weight...
ronlaughlin is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 06:00 AM
  #5  
bronko22000's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 5
From: Eastern PA
Default

I've never weighed my charges and always measured by volume. But it would seem logical that measuring by weight would give you more consistent results.
I am surprised about the fact that BH209 has different densities from lot to lot as Ron stated. How much that would affect your accuracy - who knows.
bronko22000 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 06:25 AM
  #6  
cayugad's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,193
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

I have done both. And to be honest, found very little difference in accuracy between a weighed charge and a volume measured charge. But let me add, I don't shoot long distances. So the distances I normally shoot, a slight variation in powder charge would have little to no effect. If that were stretched out ten fold, I am sure that some notice in accuracy could and probably would be noted.
cayugad is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 06:41 AM
  #7  
BarnesAddict's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: Near a lake with no fish
Default

I've shot and used BH209 since it became available and at ranges from 100yds to 400yds. I've always shot it by weight, using the conversion provided by Western (.7). Shooting by weight, I've never experienced any differences from one container to another of my POI. My normal charge from production rifles was 75grs by weight, which using the conversion number provided by Western equals 107.1grs volume. In the Ultimate, I shot 100grs by weight (NOT for production rifles), again no change from bottle to bottle in POI. However....... shooting heavy charges from a custom barrel, BH does require swabbing every 3rd shot to maintain long range groups.
BarnesAddict is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 07:30 AM
  #8  
Muley Hunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Volume shoots consistent groups for me.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 07:33 AM
  #9  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by cayugad
I have done both. And to be honest, found very little difference in accuracy between a weighed charge and a volume measured charge. But let me add, I don't shoot long distances. So the distances I normally shoot, a slight variation in powder charge would have little to no effect. If that were stretched out ten fold, I am sure that some notice in accuracy could and probably would be noted.

Took the words right out of my mouth. I haven't found an advantage to weighing charges.
TNHagies is offline  
Reply
Old 11-19-2014 | 07:33 AM
  #10  
WV Hunter's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,906
Likes: 0
From: Virginia / West Virginia
Default

I don't shoot BH209, but I've always just used volume. While I don't shoot nearly as much as some of you, my groups have always seemed to be very consistent. I try to be consistent with my method of volume measuring so that hopefully my loads are close.
WV Hunter is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.