Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
Cross Patch Follies >

Cross Patch Follies

Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Cross Patch Follies

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-27-2013, 05:40 PM
  #1  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
Semisane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Posts: 10,917
Default Cross Patch Follies

Well guys, I did it.

You probably saw my post on a plan to try shooting conicals with lubed cloth cross patches in my .45 caliber 1:30 twist GM barreled Renegade.





It was a pleasant seventy-two degrees when I returned from the Saturday morning hunt - too warm for hunting but about perfect for a range session.

So I hauled the Renegade and necessary gear the 25 yards from my little hooch to the shooting bench on the hunting club's rifle range, and prepared for a fun and interesting time.

After dumping 85 grains of GOEX FFg down the bore, I lubed two strips of .020 denim with Liquid Wrench and seated the base of a .429/240 grain Speer Deep Curl in the bore. It looked something like this.



It was pretty darn tight with just about 1/4" of the bullet length in the bore. But I used a short starter and proceeded to pound it in until the nose of the bullet was flush with the muzzle. THAT WAS IT. I could not get it even a smidgen deeper no matter how hard I pounded on the short starter. DANG, DANG, and DAMMIT!

Thinking I could use a ball screw to pull it out, I tried one. But there was no way a standard ball screw would start itself into the nose of that Deep Curl, no matter how hard I tried. It looked as though this experiment would be over without a shot being fired. The gun was out of action.

Mulling over my options, I walked back to my hooch and found a two-inch deck screw in a jar of miscellaneous screws and nails. Deck screws are a lot thinner and pointier than ball screws. I was able to screw that thing about a half-inch into the bullet with a Phillips head screw driver. Then I gripped the screw from the side just below the head with a pair of pliers and pounded upward on the pliers with a piece of 2x4. About six good hits got the bullet out. HALLELUJAH!

Realizing it was foolish to pound that jacketed bullet in the way I did (a little late, don't you think ) I thought I might try a lead bullet.

So I tried a .429/240 grain hard cast lead bullet, and switched to .016 thick patch material.



With the thinner patch material well lubed, I was able to seat it flush with the muzzle just fine. It was tight, but I could tell It would go down the clean unfired bore OK. I seated it on the powder charge with the steel Knight range rod with no great difficulty, and shot at a dot on a 18" x 24" sheet of paper at 15 yards. It hit about 8 inches directly below the target dot and cut a perfect hole in the paper. NOW WE'RE GETTING SOMEWHERE.

Would a second shot hit in the same place? I swabbed the bore with two sides of an alcohol patch and one dry patch, and proceeded to reload. Uh-oh! I got about 1/8" of the bullet into the muzzle and it hung up tight. Not wanting a repeat of the deck screw & pliers fiasco, and not having any thinner patch material on hand, I pulled it out with the pliers and gave up on .429 diameter bullets.

Switching to .400/200 grain XTP's, I loaded one with the .016 patch material. It loaded just fine and felt nice and snug in the bore. It hit the target paper about four-inches above and six-inches to the right of the target dot.

Now for a second shot. As I prepared, one of the guys walked out the the range to see what I was doing. After a short bull session, I finished loading and took the shot. Pop - no BANG. Second cap, Pop - no BANG.

OH POOP! I dry balled that bullet. No big deal. Red faced, I removed the clean out screw on the bolster, worked in some GOEX, replaced the screw, and shot the bullet out at about the speed a two year old can throw a golf ball.



The second attempt to load another XTP was successful. But the bullet hit six-inches above and eight-inches to the left of the target dot. The two shots were over eighteen inches apart, at 15 yards. Besides that, one of them cut a keyhole slot in the paper.

Not wanting to give up, I decided to try 180 grain Gold Dots.



Well, the results were about the same as with the 200 grain XTPs - two shots wide apart with one bullet cutting an oblong hole in the paper.



Frustrated, I put a target out at 50 yards, took five shots with 85 grains of GOEX under the 180 grain Gold Dots in Harvester 45/40 sabots, and shot a nice one-inch five shot group.

Time for a beer!


Last edited by Semisane; 01-27-2013 at 07:13 PM.
Semisane is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:09 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
WV Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia / West Virginia
Posts: 4,906
Default

Originally Posted by Semisane


Too funny.

It was a valient effort Semi! And "Follies" is about right. Did you blame your buddy on the dry load? LOL
WV Hunter is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:15 PM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,092
Default

But did the cloth catch fire??
Underclocked is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 06:21 PM
  #4  
Dominant Buck
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default

I tried the same thing a long time ago. And the results were about the same as yours. But it is fun to play with different things.
cayugad is offline  
Old 01-27-2013, 07:31 PM
  #5  
1874sharpsshooter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was going to try paper patching some 230 lehighs just to see how they would do for long range shooting but maybe I won't now . Then again it can't be any worse than a cross patch , right ?
 
Old 01-28-2013, 02:54 PM
  #6  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 491
Default

Great post, you are always good for a laugh. I would of thought the patches would of caught fire using liquid wrench.
deer655 is offline  
Old 01-28-2013, 03:06 PM
  #7  
Fork Horn
 
monoped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Mi.
Posts: 282
Default

You might be on to something, loading powder first.
Dry ball award!
Thanks for sharing semi sane.
monoped is offline  
Old 01-30-2013, 01:04 PM
  #8  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,746
Default

Hmmm, If I had to take a guess I would have said that it would have worked. Glad you had the time to prove it doesn't. Interesting and humorous at the same time.
Thanks Semi.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 01-30-2013, 01:32 PM
  #9  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
Semisane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Posts: 10,917
Default

I still think it's a sound principle. After all, some long range target shooters of old used cross patched paper bullets. The were long, soft lead, smooth side conicals. I may have to play with them again some day with a wider variety of bullets, patch thicknesses and lubes.
Semisane is offline  
Old 01-30-2013, 04:30 PM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
HuntAway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Renfrew County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,392
Default

I wonder if the results would be similar in a slower twist rifle, say 1:48?


Thanks for saving me some powder and lead though!


HA
HuntAway is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.