|
Originally Posted by SuperKirby
(Post 3853247)
Something like that, but probably an inch or two longer. I think I could do it, but I'm not sure I really want to chance a $400 mistake.
|
I thought you could go as short as 16-1/2"?? And still be classified as a rifle?? Any good gunsmith would know.
I think it is a good idea if you are a woods hunter. You will probably burn a little less powder. But I don't think you would be giving up too much. Or at least not enough that it would make any difference in woods hunting distances. I like a shorter rifle. That is one reason I like the Encore. They are 3" or 4" shorter to start with since there is no action. Take a look for one of the Katahdin MZ barrels. I don't remember how long they are. But they are shorter. Tom. |
He would be fine. The pro hunter shorty in the picture Omega provided is 19 3/4 inches and Kirby was wanting a inch or two longer.
|
I would like to get one of the Katahdin barrels, but that's another $400. I did find a non-pro hunter version that I might be interested in for $300. I figure my other option is to find a SS .45 Bergara barrel and cut that down. That might be a fun way to go and I'm still looking at about $300 either way. But for right now it's all going to have to wait. It's just not in the budget. Hopefully it will be my project for next year. |
Originally Posted by chaded
(Post 3855139)
He would be fine. The pro hunter shorty in the picture Omega provided is 19 3/4 inches and Kirby was wanting a inch or two longer.
I did find out I will be good to go with the less then 16.5" barrel. It will look good if anything!!! :lolabove: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.