10 ML vs. 10 MLII
 

Just wondering what the difference is between the two. What did they change?

RE: 10 ML vs. 10 MLII
 

http://www.savagearms.com/cs_muzzleloader.htm

Quote:

---

The 10ML has a separate module to hold the primer. The 10MLII loads the primer directly onto the bolt face.

---

RE: 10 ML vs. 10 MLII
 

Savage 10ML breech plug with "percussion module" on left and original vent liner on right:

RE: 10 ML vs. 10 MLII
 

10ML-II breech plug with redesigned vent-liner on right and breech plug wrench on left.

RE: 10 ML vs. 10 MLII
 

The original design held the primer in the "percussion module" on the left of the top photo, which was then fed into the chamber essentially by a conventional bolt face like a CF cartridge. The problem was that you needed special tools to prime and deprime the module, and the rifle, because of the conventional bolt design (which was very similar to a bolt action CF) the rifle could be converted to a CF cartridge rifle, which would negate the BATF exemption for muzzleloading arms. Also, if you lost the module in the field, you were screwed.

The 10ML-II eliminated the "percussion module" and replaced it with a fully fixed breech plug design. The 209 primer is now held by the bolt face directly and then cams into the breech plug opening seen on the left of the second picture. This very effectively seals the primer and results in virtually no blowback into the action. Also, the bolt on the 10ML-II is now rear locking and has no front locking lugs, making it very difficult to convert to a CF rifle.

Mike