Bullet's
#11
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,246
RE: Bullet's
ORIGINAL: sabotloader
hunting junkie
I know and I swear their was no trick photography involved - i was standing on the bank looking down... but it was a decent sized cow... There was a lot of steaks in the two hinys and they were good....
The .458/300 Sierra - really might surprise you in how well it flys. It is a Pro-Hunter designed for the 45-70 so it should be a shooter and do the job when it hits...
hunting junkie
i have to laugh, it looks like it is bigger than the truck
The .458/300 Sierra - really might surprise you in how well it flys. It is a Pro-Hunter designed for the 45-70 so it should be a shooter and do the job when it hits...
Chap
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,246
RE: Bullet's
ORIGINAL: fusion
I've spent a small fortune on New Bullets this winter (see below) to try in my Savage ML. Can't wait for a decent day to do some shooting.
Barnes Original, 300gr, .458
Sierra Pro Hunter 300gr, .458
Barnes TSX-FN, 300gr, .458
Nosler Partition, 300gr, .458
I've spent a small fortune on New Bullets this winter (see below) to try in my Savage ML. Can't wait for a decent day to do some shooting.
Barnes Original, 300gr, .458
Sierra Pro Hunter 300gr, .458
Barnes TSX-FN, 300gr, .458
Nosler Partition, 300gr, .458
I know from shooting the 300g Barnes Origonal SSP that 68g of H4198 is too much recoil for me, so I am dropping back to 53g, which is about what I have read is shot in a 45/70.
Chap
#13
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,246
RE: Bullet's
ORIGINAL: fusion
I've spent a small fortune on New Bullets this winter (see below) to try in my Savage ML. Can't wait for a decent day to do some shooting.
Barnes Original, 300gr, .458
Sierra Pro Hunter 300gr, .458
Barnes TSX-FN, 300gr, .458
Nosler Partition, 300gr, .458
I've spent a small fortune on New Bullets this winter (see below) to try in my Savage ML. Can't wait for a decent day to do some shooting.
Barnes Original, 300gr, .458
Sierra Pro Hunter 300gr, .458
Barnes TSX-FN, 300gr, .458
Nosler Partition, 300gr, .458
Chap
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,246
RE: Bullet's
ORIGINAL: fusion
Barnes Original, 300gr, .458
Barnes Original, 300gr, .458
And in particular these words:
So in my Savage, with 67g of 4198, I was shooting about 2350 fps, plenty for the Barnes 300g Origonal Spire Point to expand, but you will be shooting closer to 2000, so at 100 yards, I don't think they will expand for you. They are honestly a long distance smokeless or hot load Blackhorn 209 bullet in my opinion--well constructed for sure--most of the time only 15% weight loss. I shot them one year and have 3 boxes of50which I think I will sell to Tar12 over on the Savage Forum if he wants them. I don't plan on using them again. You gotta kiss a lotta pigs before you find your bullet princess. Because of the .292 Ballistic Coefficient they are a "long range bullet" in my opinion.
Chap
#15
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Webster NY.
Posts: 189
RE: Bullet's
Chap,
if I can get good accuracy out of the Barnes TSX that would be my first choice as I think the terminal performance would be the best out of the four I had listed. Although Sabotloader's info on the Nosler is very impressive as well. I'm switching powder this year, going from AA5744 to IMR-SR-4759. Have you had any problems with hang fire or mis-fire with the 4198? . I am thinking 43 grains of the 4759 should get me near 2200 feet per second.
if I can get good accuracy out of the Barnes TSX that would be my first choice as I think the terminal performance would be the best out of the four I had listed. Although Sabotloader's info on the Nosler is very impressive as well. I'm switching powder this year, going from AA5744 to IMR-SR-4759. Have you had any problems with hang fire or mis-fire with the 4198? . I am thinking 43 grains of the 4759 should get me near 2200 feet per second.
#17
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,246
RE: Bullet's
ORIGINAL: fusion
Chap,
if I can get good accuracy out of the Barnes TSX that would be my first choice as I think the terminal performance would be the best out of the four I had listed. Although Sabotloader's info on the Nosler is very impressive as well. I'm switching powder this year, going from AA5744 to IMR-SR-4759. Have you had any problems with hang fire or mis-fire with the 4198? . I am thinking 43 grains of the 4759 should get me near 2200 feet per second.
Chap,
if I can get good accuracy out of the Barnes TSX that would be my first choice as I think the terminal performance would be the best out of the four I had listed. Although Sabotloader's info on the Nosler is very impressive as well. I'm switching powder this year, going from AA5744 to IMR-SR-4759. Have you had any problems with hang fire or mis-fire with the 4198? . I am thinking 43 grains of the 4759 should get me near 2200 feet per second.
I have shot deer between the ribs and the Noslers that didn't expand, the MZ and TSX I am sure would because of huge hollow point and the grooves down on the inside of the TSX causing it to open quickly. I agree that would be the best terminal performer. In a Savage I think the TSX is better because it is .458 and it is designed for a 2000-2200fps 45/70, I think the MZ is designed for 1500 to 1900 inlines and basically that is the difference. I think the 45/70 are stronger, both open equally well in my opinion. I shot 3 deer last year with the Barnes MZ and all of them were DRT or within 20 yards. I like that type of terminal performance of the huge Hollow Point Barnes.
Chap
#18
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,246
RE: Bullet's
ORIGINAL: LaneNebraska
Great info on the bullets guys!
However, I think we should keep the Smokeless loadings over on the Smokeless forum, as not to confuse any in-liners, for safety sake
Great info on the bullets guys!
However, I think we should keep the Smokeless loadings over on the Smokeless forum, as not to confuse any in-liners, for safety sake