adequate scope for new ML
 

I just moved to Indiana from the west coast and am looking to hunt deer next year. I picked up a T/C Omega Z5 after numerous recommendations, and now I am looking for a scope to put on it. Funds are limited (isn't that always the case?) and so I was debating between a fixed 4x, or a 3-9 variable.For the same money I could get a better scope with the fixed, fewer things to go wrong, and I know I won't be taking a shot over 150yds. Any advice? I was looking at a nikon buckmaster if I go the 4x route, and probably something not quite so nice if I go with the 3-9. Thanks.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

Several have purchased the Nikon ProStaff 2x7 and I've yet to hear/read anything but praise for the scope.



U29654
6308
PROSTAFF 2-7X32 SHOTGUN MATTE
MAX
$112.69

That's at http://www.ultout.com/nikon-optics.htm

It's shorter than either of the BuckMaster models you mention and offers good eye-relief. Should be plenty of scope for your rifle. Be sure to buy good mounts.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

+1, I have two, one on my muzzleloader and one on my slug gun. I plan on getting another after the season.....maybe there will be some year end sales. Keep your eyes open.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I also recommend the nikon prostaff. My Wolf came with a Bushnell 3-9x scope. Note a bad little scope but all my others are nikon.

1 question for you. Why wait til next year if our firearms season doesn't start til november 17th and black powder doesn't start til I beleive december 8th?

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I have two of the Pro Staff on inlines and one Buckmaster 1X power. All Nikons are great scopes.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

My CVA Staghorn has a 4X Nikon ProStaff:That is also a very good low light scope.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I've got the Nikon Prostaff 2x7x32 on my Omega and i love it. Great scope.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

dr. bullseye

Guess it is up to me to go the other way again... I really prefer the Bushnell Elite 3200's - 3x9x40 with a ballistic reticlule. Thet have a fast focus eye-ring and rainguard lens - i very seldon use scope cover at all anymore...

From Scopes 'n more - you can get the regular dual X for 179 and the ballistic reticule for $235?

Really good scopes....

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I use a Tasco Bantam scope and it holds up nicely.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

well to me it makes sense to consider what would be best for hunting, I consider a 3X9 and a 4X12 as more target than hunting I want a scope that will give me an advantage by making things brighter when I have to take a shot in low light. If you go to the trouble to check the lum. # on different scopes you will find that the bigger the front lens is in ratio to the power the brighter it will be.
SO I use a 1.5X4X32 or a 2X7X40 usually a Bushnell or Swift it works quite well for me, and I will still shoot groups with anybody. Lee

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I have the 3-9-40 Prostaff on most of my centerfires. I will be putting the 2-7-32 on my ML and my 30-30 next season.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I would love to get out there but have run into a couple of problems.

A. I haven't shot my gun yet and would need several trips to the range before I felt comfortable enough to take it into the field.

B. I just moved here, don't know the area well yet, don't have any friends with land to hunt on, and haven't been able to scout out any of the public lands.

Again, I would love to go, but I just don't feel like I have time to get all my ducks in a row before the season got here. (the real problem is the 80 hour work weeks I'm putting in)

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

Hey Bullseye, I live in Indy, what part in Indiana are you in?

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

My vote is forthe Bushnell Banner Dawn to Dusk, 3 X9, 40 MM objective lens. Really a good scope for the money and designed for muzzle loaders. I am completely satisfied with it.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I have a TC Omega as well. First I had the 3x9 40mmNikon Pro Staff on it. Didnt like the shorter eye relief. Took it back and bought the Nikon Omega.........Longer eye relief, 5 inches. I like it alot better

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I am in Indy as well. We live on the west side, just outside the belt.

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

bushnell banner with circle dot reticle scope;)

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

One of the best buys out there,is a Sightron Scope. They have a Mil-Dot 3x9x40 that is as clear as scopes costing twice as much. A lifetime No=BS Warrentee,and very fast service. http://www.midwayusa.com/eproductpage.exe/showproduct?saleitemid=958927&t=11082005

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I bought a 4 x 32 Simmons Shotgun scope with a diamond reticle at Walmart for 50 some bucks. It is great in lowlight and has a continuous 4 1/2" eye relief. It isa VERY good scope for the money. Actually in my opinion it compares to the lower end "high dollar" scopes, if not better! It has great optics and has the thumb screw adjustments for easy sighting. I honestly believe you can't go wrong this scope for the money.

chris

RE: adequate scope for new ML
 

I'mout on 10th& Raceway.
You've got a couple decent publiclands within an hours drive. Give me a shout if I can help you in any way.