Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
 Idaho reconsidering??? >

Idaho reconsidering???

Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Idaho reconsidering???

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-16-2007, 06:10 AM
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 136
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

Roundball, why is a modern inline ML so much "easier" to use than a "traditional" ML. Why do they intimidate you to this level? They both use percussion caps, they are both loaded from the muzzle, and hopefully they both go off when the trigger is pulled. As it has been stated many times previously, scopes are not allowed on ML's during muzzleloader only hunts in Idaho. I honestly do not see how you think that a Hawken or whatever sidelock you like to use, is so much more challenging to shoot, its not. I don't see that using a Hawken style of weapon being any more challenging than using an inline. You must ride your horse to all your hunting sites to I'll bet. Start your fire with sticks, probably look a lot like matches. I am just tired of someone jerking around our weapon requirements all the time. It seems to me, I may be wrong on this issue, that the whole point is to give a hunter who likes a little more of a challenge, a special season, hopefully a little better season, to experience this challenge. Also, limiting range, especially in areas that are much closer to residences. I just don't get you Roundball, probably never will.
Follower is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 07:05 PM
  #62  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

my tribe has been killin elk in idaho with muzzleloaders for over 25 years. the only problem we have with the new rules is that you cannot buy a new gun with a fast twist in a sidelock. tc's, dynomite nobel, clear shot, power belt
bob74 is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 08:18 PM
  #63  
Fork Horn
 
Flatland Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rantoul IL USA
Posts: 193
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

TC Firestorm 1 in 28, Lyman Great Plains Hunter 1 in 32... get some drop in aftermarket barrels as well that are fast twist...
Flatland Hunter is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 08:23 PM
  #64  
Dominant Buck
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

I have a stainless steel Green Mountain Barrel with a 1-28 twist that fits right into the stock of my Thompson Center Renegade. It is 28" long and seems to like its powder charges. But it is a good shooting barrel.
cayugad is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 11:08 PM
  #65  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 136
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

If spending a few more dollars is not a problem, then rifles such as the Kahnke's and Markesbury's look like great options for rifles that meet current Idaho muzzleloader regulations. I have a buddy that out of pure principle, has built up a T/C .50 Hawken with a Green Mountain barrel and he swears that this gun is actually more accurate than his inline. Thats what makes these muzzleloader regulations so ridiculous. I also hope that if someone wants to shoot balls out of their muzzleloader, they actually shoot a muzzleloader designed for them, say something with a 1 in 66" twist, and long barrel. Have personally seen, on elk, not so much on deer, many animals wounded and not found.If I was going to outlaw something it would not be sabot rounds but roundballs. I guess the shoot and release crowd is alive andactive in our lobby here in Idaho.
Follower is offline  
Old 08-19-2007, 11:22 PM
  #66  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,180
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

Think again, Round balls are what tamed this country, Not sabots. Round balls took buffalo LONG before the sharpes rifle ever came out. With any bullet you are using, you have to know its range limits.
frontier gander is offline  
Old 08-20-2007, 04:45 PM
  #67  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Default RE: Idaho reconsidering???

Don't forget about the RMC and Traditions magnum flintlocks with fast twist barrels and 3 pellet rating. Some of the newest flint and sidelock offerings are rated for higher powder charges than are many of the older inlines.

So whats it going to be, we gona regulate muzzleloaders based on appearance or performance??
goatbrother is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jjwillie
Big Game Hunting
2
08-27-2008 08:59 AM
unimanicpsux
Upland Bird Hunting
1
11-02-2005 01:32 PM
6ptorbust
Big Game Hunting
6
04-04-2005 07:29 PM
muleman1953
Big Game Hunting
4
07-27-2004 07:58 AM
charlie brown
West
3
01-17-2002 10:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Idaho reconsidering???


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.