![]() |
Sighting in for Hunting?
Well the process of test loads and slugs for Colorado has started.
While shooting yesterday I started to think about all those guys who spit and swab after each shot while practicing. During a hunting situation you would not have time to spit and swab. You would be lucky to get 2 shots off most 3.I am also taking into account that the spit and swab method will give you the best groups. Question- Why would you sight your gun in for hunting with this method? Would it be more sensible to sight in the way you hunt, no more than 3 shots at a time then clean the bore and start again. Started testing no excuses and like what I see at 50 yards so far. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
While swabbing the barrel is a good way to work up an accurate load since technically you want to keep all contributing factors to accuracy about the same.. your correct. When I work my final hunting load I like the idea that I can load a second shot without swabbing. When I have my load worked up, I will often then shoot as many shots as I can without swabbing, just to see how the rifle reacts.
Although consider this.. if you place your first shot correctly, and then take the time to swab the barrel properly and reload, this should give the animal a chance to react to the hit, go some distance or lay down. I have yet to need a second shot on an animal with a muzzleloader. So swabbing for the second shot is not all that far fetched. With those No Excuse Conicals, if your shooting a good powder charge under them and then putting that large chunk of lead in the right place, I would worry more about where I left my knife then whether I need to swab the barrel. The destructive power of large conicals is impressive to say the least. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
In my opinion (and I have lots of them I'm told;)), When I swab I am trying to replicate my first shot from a clean barrel. My first shot and hopefully my second shot from a swabbed barrel will hopefully be very close to one another.I really don't like the idea of fouling a barrel before hunting. Mainly because I'm a little on the lazy side and don't like having to clean a rifle for no real good reason. As for the 2nd and 3rd shots well I haven't had the need for it (ML or CF), so taking the time to load up properly isn't really an issue. Heck by the time the smoke clears they (deer) don't usually offer up a decent shot anyways.
With my Omega, swabbing between shots helps me keep a 5 shot group under 2 inches at 100 yds. Admittedly,this has not been the case with my flintlock (yet) @ 50 yds,but I am working on that issue. To swab or not to swab, I guess it really boils down to your own personal prefference. (waffle):D |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: jt_6 Well the process of test loads and slugs for Colorado has started. While shooting yesterday I started to think about all those guys who spit and swab after each shot while practicing. During a hunting situation you would not have time to spit and swab. You would be lucky to get 2 shots off most 3.I am also taking into account that the spit and swab method will give you the best groups. Question- Why would you sight your gun in for hunting with this method? Would it be more sensible to sight in the way you hunt, no more than 3 shots at a time then clean the bore and start again. Started testing no excuses and like what I see at 50 yards so far. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: cayugad While swabbing the barrel is a good way to work up an accurate load since technically you want to keep all contributing factors to accuracy about the same.. your correct. When I work my final hunting load I like the idea that I can load a second shot without swabbing. When I have my load worked up, I will often then shoot as many shots as I can without swabbing, just to see how the rifle reacts. Although consider this.. if you place your first shot correctly, and then take the time to swab the barrel properly and reload, this should give the animal a chance to react to the hit, go some distance or lay down. I have yet to need a second shot on an animal with a muzzleloader. So swabbing for the second shot is not all that far fetched. With those No Excuse Conicals, if your shooting a good powder charge under them and then putting that large chunk of lead in the right place, I would worry more about where I left my knife then whether I need to swab the barrel. The destructive power of large conicals is impressive to say the least. Chap Gleason |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: HuntAway In my opinion (and I have lots of them I'm told;)), When I swab I am trying to replicate my first shot from a clean barrel. My first shot and hopefully my second shot from a swabbed barrel will hopefully be very close to one another.I really don't like the idea of fouling a barrel before hunting. Mainly because I'm a little on the lazy side and don't like having to clean a rifle for no real good reason. As for the 2nd and 3rd shots well I haven't had the need for it (ML or CF), so taking the time to load up properly isn't really an issue. Heck by the time the smoke clears they (deer) don't usually offer up a decent shot anyways. With my Omega, swabbing between shots helps me keep a 5 shot group under 2 inches at 100 yds. Admittedly,this has not been the case with my flintlock (yet) @ 50 yds,but I am working on that issue. To swab or not to swab, I guess it really boils down to your own personal prefference. (waffle):D http://www.tcarms.com/assets/manuals/current/Shooting_TC_Side_Lock_Black_Powder_Guns.pdf Chap Gleason |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Oh ya that's the other reason I do it.:DGeez chapman you're taxing my memory. I haven't read that (TC)manual in dang near 30 years. By the way I just went and looked at it and that quote is on page 58 of mine.;)
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: HuntAway Oh ya that's the other reason I do it.:DGeez chapman you're taxing my memory. I haven't read that (TC)manual in dang near 30 years. By the way I just went and looked at it and that quote is on page 58 of mine.;) |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Learning from a buddy. Agreed
Only problem here is that nobody shoots them that much.[&o]And it has been a self / www taught lesson plan for me and I have people like you and cayugadto thank for those lessons.:) |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: HuntAway Learning from a buddy. Agreed Only problem here is that nobody shoots them that much.[&o]And it has been a self / www taught lesson plan for me and I have people like you and cayugadto thank for those lessons.:) Chap Gleason |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
For those who might be interested, here is a good link on military bullet wound patterns. Check out the M193 5.56mm round. Fackler is the foremost wound ballistics person in the world today.
http://home.snafu.de/l.moeller/Zielwirkung/military_bullet_wound_patterns.html |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Been hunting for a while and no matter how good the shot, they still manage to run off. Sometimes they go on for what seems like forever.
When I harvest game, I always want get the clean shot -if possible -under ideal conditions. But this is not always the case. So I always load up the second shot as soon as possible if a second shot is needed. That is how I practise and it works for me. The idea of taking the time to get that wet patch out of a baggy and swabbing down the bore and then using a dry patch to get out the moisture and then loading the bore would be nice if the game would cooperate. I don't want to sound harsh, just practible. Under ideal conditions I would love to swab the bore between shots. I just don't think this is a realistic idea or practise. But this being said, it is all IMHO! ;) |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Sight in and fire atleast 2 shots without swabbing. You need to know how that barrel will react without the swabbing. You can use the biggest bullet you can find, but if its not placed right and you need a quick follow up shot, you need to know where that 2nd bullet will go with a dirty bore. Always prepair for the worse and ready yourself incase you ever get caught up in that situation.
After i take the first shot, im reloading ASAP. I always hear my brother saying, hes down! You dont need to reload! I prefer to be on the safe side and know that if i need another shot, its ready and know where it will shoot with a dirty barrel. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
I agree with the last couple of posts that also want to know how the second and maybe third shot will react without a swab between. I hunt elk not deer. Elk do not go "boom flop"; or at least the last three I shot did not. I also hunt alone and do not want the big animals to wander to the bottom of the next ravine to die. I try to hit them at least twice with hopes of stopping them within 100 yards or less. The last one with two good hits and both lungs, and a partial liver hitwent at least a quarter mile and I had to head shoot her at that time to drop the animal. Sometimes they do not know they are dead. I am working on getting a White to shoot heavy conicals. I finally found one and am working on the second one just because I can't stop buying nice rifles. The White seems to be the elk answer. My Omega shoots 300gr. bullets but they are not heavy enough for me based on the last couple of results.
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
If the only way you can get consistent accuracy from a rifle is by swabbing between shots, I think when hunting I would still swab. Granted, there are rifles out there that shoot on a clean barrel and even on a fowled barrel close enough that it makes little or no difference. But if your rifle is not one of them, like my Knight Disc... you have a problem. I would take that few minutes of time to swab it. Give yourself time to calm down, think out your last shot and what happened, decide on your new direction of travel, note landmarks, etc as you swab and reload. For now you know the second shotshould be as accurate as the first was. As for damp patches, a simple zip lock bag with them in, is easy to carry. Snap a rubber band in the middle, one side damp, one side dry. After all it is not like you need to carry a hundred of them.
Here is my outlook on this. Let us say you shoot and do not score what might be considered a great hit. The deer/elk/woodchuck/ what ever runs off. Most hunters I grew up with used to tell me, do not chase right after them. Give them time to react to the hit. But in your case, you shove another bullet down the barrel knowing there is a chance for that load not to be as accurate as your first. So your going after a wounded animal that will be in flight mode and probably be watching for danger, your shot might be a moving shot at the animal, maybe even some distance to it. And you're not sure of your rifle's accuracy, all because you would not take a few minutes to calm down and swab the barrel? I guess I disagree. Now if you can work up a load that shoots as well shot to shot, then by all means reload ASAP. But if your rifle is one of them that is not of that breed, you have to consider your options. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
jt 6
Reading thoughtcayugad's last entry I do not know if you can get any straigter answer than he is giving you. Granted, there are rifles out there that shoot on a clean barrel and even on a fowled barrel close enough that it makes little or no difference. Give yourself time to calm down, think out your last shot and what happened, decide on your new direction of travel, note landmarks, etc as you swab and reload. For now you know the second shotshould be as accurate as the first was. As for damp patches, a simple zip lock bag with them in, is easy to carry. Snap a rubber band in the middle, one side damp, one side dry. After all it is not like you need to carry a hundred of them. Most hunters I grew up with used to tell me, do not chase right after them. Give them time to react to the hit. Another reason I damp patch after a shot is (and this is a no-no to a lot of people) I do not pull or shoot out a load at the end of the day. I am using T7 and it is the least corrosive of all the synthetics that I might use - so I do leave loads in from day-to-day or even a week. Another no-no - I do not strip clean the gun until the end of the season in most circumstances, unless I have subjected it to so really bad weather and even then I am not in to big of a hurry because i do have a very very light coat of gun oil in the bore to protect it from rusting either from condensation or moisture from outside. So my general rule is I always shoot a relatively clean barrel 99% of the time just as it is when I sight it in... just my thoughts... |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
As posted on another thread, my Optima likes a dirty bore. My first shot out of clean bore can go anywhere. If I don't swab for 3 or 4 shots, they are almost all touching. How fouled does a bore get by shooting off a couple primers? Does this produce any residue?
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Primers produce a little fowling, but with the new primers, I doubt very much. On my rifles that like to be fowled, I load up a powder charge, then slide a couple of wads on top of that and fire it off. Then swab and load the barrel. In your case, just load the barrel.
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Powerbelt booklet says to foul a barrel properly, dump 20 grains of your powder into the bore and then prime and fire it without a bullet. Then load up with your normal load and bullet and its ready.
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Thanks guys...I'll give it a try. Cayugad, in getting the scoped dialed in, would you still dial it in with a clean bore?
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Stupid question.....I have never fired my rifle with just powder.....what can I expect?
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: oldrookie Stupid question.....I have never fired my rifle with just powder.....what can I expect? |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: oldrookie Thanks guys...I'll give it a try. Cayugad, in getting the scoped dialed in, would you still dial it in with a clean bore? |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
oldrookie
in getting the scoped dialed in, would you still dial it in with a clean bore? My routine is the same as my centerfires.... I shoot the gun preseason, verify that everything is a go, and then I will damp patch the barrel (field clean) but the barrel really does not undergo a bench clean until after the hunting season. Hence the barrel has always been patched cleaned and is semi-fouled for shooting whether it is shooting at the range or hunting. But again remember I am using T7 powder, I am not sure I would do the same thing shooting Pyro or real BP. My first shot out of a "well oiled" barrel is always some what off, but a coupleof alcohol patches prior to shooting eliminates most of that problem also. Hope this make some sort of sense... |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Sabotloader, I have been racing home after a day of shooting to break the rifle down and get it cleaned. Obviously, if you go a whole season without breaking it down, this must be a little anile on my part. I will fire some powder though before hitting targets and see what happens. Thanks for the comments. Thats what makes this forum so great for the newbie!
|
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
oldrookie
Remember, I am shooting T7 if you are shooting Pyro it might be prudent to clean it well. Another thing my damp patches are regular old blue windex - it has a bit of ammonia in it which serves to dry water and speed drying in the barrel, not to mention that it is death on T7 residue, just melts the stuff. It will take 3/4 windex patches to cleanmost of the residue from your barrel, then two dry patches and then a very lightly oiled, and I mean lightly oiled patch down the barrel, then a dry patch and your barrel will be good for the duration. Your barrel is still acutually fouled a bit but not heavily. Enough that your accuracy will remain the same. Also, I do not remove the breech plug, I am a wrapper - I wrap the plug in teflon tape and it is good for thewhole season no matter how much I shoot. The one thing that can change all of this is if I get the interior of the barrel really wet.... if I contaminate a load with rain or snow - then I will strip clean it and start over, because of rust not fouling. I use this same procedure with stainless and blued barrels... I really believe the cleaning qualities of windex allow me to get away with this. Reminder the gun is never put away or stored any length of time on a fully fouled barrel, it would have to be damp patched and dryed. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Sabotloader, I have been using the clear windex. I think it has vinegar in it....not sure about the ammonia. I have been using the 777 pellets but will cross over to powder once I figure out what I need to measure it and pour it....lol. Your right, a couple of swipes with the windex patches and the dry one simply comes out grey. I thought that was pretty good just swabbing.
I learned the wrapping thing from you. I have been using the plumbers tape since day-1 and can break the plug loose with one hand. I'll remember the fouled barrel routine as I get closer to hunting season. As stated earlier, my Optima does not like a clean bore but I am sure there is a fine line when it becomes too fouled. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
oldrookie
I have been using the clear windex. I think it has vinegar in it....not sure about the ammonia. That, a handful of patches, your jag, and a small "to go" bottle of Breakfree is all you need. Windex (yes, with ammonia) is a very good bore cleaner. Dan Lilja of Lilja Precision Rifle barrels has never seen any damage in one of his barrels caused by the use of ammonia. Dan writes: "The rumor is that copper-removing cleaners with ammonia will pit and damage the interior surface of a barrel. Ammonia is very effective as a copper remover. We use solvents, such as Butch's Bore Shine, to remove copper during the break-in. We routinely leave Butch's solution in the barrel over night too. Again, I repeat, we have never seen a problem with ammonia in the concentrations found in commercial cleaners, in either our chrome-moly or stainless steel barrels. This includes examination with our borescope." Black powder enthusiasts have universally praised Dan's personal favorite barrel cleaning solvent, "Butch's Bore Shine." |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: cayugad ORIGINAL: oldrookie Stupid question.....I have never fired my rifle with just powder.....what can I expect? |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
I swab with Butch's BLACK POWDER Bore Shine between shots, and love it. Thestuff labeled "Black Powder" isnot the same as regular Butch's Bore Shine. I don't believe the BP stuff has any ammonia. It's almost odor free, with a very, veryslight smell that reminds me of shampoo.
I use onefairly damp patch, in and out once on each side, followed by two dry patches. The second side of the second dry patch comes out almost perfectly clean. |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: oldrookie Sabotloader, I have been using the clear windex. I think it has vinegar in it....not sure about the ammonia. I have been using the 777 pellets but will cross over to powder once I figure out what I need to measure it and pour it....lol. Your right, a couple of swipes with the windex patches and the dry one simply comes out grey. I thought that was pretty good just swabbing. I learned the wrapping thing from you. I have been using the plumbers tape since day-1 and can break the plug loose with one hand. I'll remember the fouled barrel routine as I get closer to hunting season. As stated earlier, my Optima does not like a clean bore but I am sure there is a fine line when it becomes too fouled. You can buy a TC graduated powder meaure for about $5 or any brand, also buy some of these powder holders to put loose in at here: http://www.rmcsports.com Click "on line catalog" then "EZ Speed Loaders on LHS". I bought 50 of these and I have 10 for each of my ML guns (10 extra for another gun). I premeasure the loads in my garage and store them in each of these. I mark each set of the 10 with what gun I am shooting them in. I find carrying loose power in normal speed loaders messy as the loose powder gets between the sabot and bullet, so these little tubes are really nice. Some folks use film canisters, or Vet needle holders, that is a low cost way to go if you can find someone who has a lot of those things. These tubesare about $1 each, so that will not break you. Chap Gleason |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
ORIGINAL: jt_6 Well the process of test loads and slugs for Colorado has started. While shooting yesterday I started to think about all those guys who spit and swab after each shot while practicing. During a hunting situation you would not have time to spit and swab. You would be lucky to get 2 shots off most 3.I am also taking into account that the spit and swab method will give you the best groups. Question- Why would you sight your gun in for hunting with this method? Would it be more sensible to sight in the way you hunt, no more than 3 shots at a time then clean the bore and start again. ![]() |
RE: Sighting in for Hunting?
Well there is lots of good info in the posts from you guys. My final thoughts after a few years of hunting with the loader. Ihave been sighting in my gun as I would with a rifle by shooting 3 shots then cleaning. Over the past 3 years I have been shooting 777 and remington clean shot primers in my Omega. The 3 shot groups are together with no flyers. Which I consider the most imortant part of all this.I do see slight change starting at 4 but nothing to be alarmed at.Still no flyers but a wider group. Where I do see a significant change is from 8 shot and up. Obviously we are not going to shoot that many times at an animal. I am sighting in at ranges from 50 to 125 yards. I average 100-125 shots on the range prior to the season. So for me it is no swap after every shot at practice as I would duringhunting season. I alsoclean my gun after every shooting session and I start the next day of hunting with a fresh load.I love to seee the sparks fly at dusk when ending the day in the woods.Thanks for all the great discussion.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.