range finders
 

Which is the best range finder?

RE: range finders
 

Can't go wrong with a Leica. Best glass, makes a huge difference on foggy/rainy days.

RE: handles
 

What about the bushnell 1000?

RE: handles
 

I have owned the bushnell 800 and now own the leica 1200 which I find to be a far superior instrument.

RE: handles
 

Leica. Good luck.

RE: range finders
 

I would have to agree with the Leica. Well worth the $$$;)

RE: range finders
 

I've been very happy with my Wind River combo bino/rangefinder. For my style of hunting, where I want instant access to good binos and a rangefinder, it was worth the $700 to me.

RE: range finders
 

If you look through them all you'll find that the leica is far and away the best rangefinder out there. accurate, and an easy to read "read-out" (it is red like that of a digital alarm clock), and above all clearer than any other rangefinder I've ever seen.

RE: range finders
 

Maybe it depends on what you are using them for. My dad has a Leica he bought about 1.5 yrs. ago. Don't know the model no. Anyway, when we were trying to range at close distances (less than 30 yds.) we could not get a reading. I was trying to set some markers for an archery set up inside of 30 yds.

It was enough to convince me not to get a Leica for archery purposes. Sounds like it works good on longer distances. I've heard a lot of good on the Bushnell Scout, again for archery, but have no personal experience.

Just my .02

RE: range finders
 

If you're strictly a bowhunter, save some bucks and leave the Leica on the shelf. I've seen what Elkhair is talking about. Having done lots of testing of all types of rangefinders before I bought mine (Nikon 600), I found that the Leica gave inaccurate readings at ranges under 30 yards.

RE: range finders
 

Thanks for the great ideas. I think I am going to get the bushnell.

RE: range finders
 

It realley depends on your needs!!! For other than bow the lieca. I use my rangefinder mostly for bowhunting and have the bushnell pro scout which works perfect for that application. I do use it for rifle and ml, but not to specifically range game but rather reference points when setting up. The reason is smaller means harder to hold steady, second low light situations the black read is not the best nor is light transmission..so if I was wanting a RF to range on game I would buy the Leica.

RE: range finders
 

Marty,

I have heard consistantly the Leica is the best, thus it probably is. With that said, the number of hunters out there in the field with a range finder are by far in the minority. I have an older Bushnell (800 yard compact, model) that has always worked for me quite well. I use mine mostly for high power rifle elk hunting with ranging over 400 yards not really of concern. I use it when I "set up" for game so I know my trajectories in advance according to which way the game may come.

The main thing is to "have one". They do embolden you in terms or your shot selection.
Usually, there are only so many hunting dollars to go around, especially if you have any kids that you are also equipping. For example I would rather have a Bushnell AND a GPS than just a Leica range finder. It is all a trade off.

Good Luck and Good Hunting,
EKM

RE: range finders
 

i have the leica and have used them now for 3 years.they have never failed at any distance to give a reading.one thing they have over the others is that the reading is in red.that is much better in low light conditions.