range finders
Which is the best range finder?
|
RE: range finders
Can't go wrong with a Leica. Best glass, makes a huge difference on foggy/rainy days.
|
RE: handles
What about the bushnell 1000?
|
RE: handles
I have owned the bushnell 800 and now own the leica 1200 which I find to be a far superior instrument.
|
RE: handles
Leica. Good luck.
|
RE: range finders
I would have to agree with the Leica. Well worth the $$$;)
|
RE: range finders
I've been very happy with my Wind River combo bino/rangefinder. For my style of hunting, where I want instant access to good binos and a rangefinder, it was worth the $700 to me.
|
RE: range finders
If you look through them all you'll find that the leica is far and away the best rangefinder out there. accurate, and an easy to read "read-out" (it is red like that of a digital alarm clock), and above all clearer than any other rangefinder I've ever seen.
|
RE: range finders
Maybe it depends on what you are using them for. My dad has a Leica he bought about 1.5 yrs. ago. Don't know the model no. Anyway, when we were trying to range at close distances (less than 30 yds.) we could not get a reading. I was trying to set some markers for an archery set up inside of 30 yds.
It was enough to convince me not to get a Leica for archery purposes. Sounds like it works good on longer distances. I've heard a lot of good on the Bushnell Scout, again for archery, but have no personal experience. Just my .02 |
RE: range finders
If you're strictly a bowhunter, save some bucks and leave the Leica on the shelf. I've seen what Elkhair is talking about. Having done lots of testing of all types of rangefinders before I bought mine (Nikon 600), I found that the Leica gave inaccurate readings at ranges under 30 yards.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.