![]() |
Federal judge orders destruction of data
A federal judge has ordered the destruction of elk/wolf data taken in the Frank Church wilderness area by IDFG, there is an article in today's Billings Gazette regarding it, please read it for yourself, mind boggling.
|
It would be easier to read it if you have provided a link.
|
|
|
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/j...-data-44900609
This one works and it isn't all data, just that that was compiled by illegally landing a helicopter in a wilderness area. That's a big no-no for anyone. So, it isn't too "mind boggling" to me. Note the following: Idaho must destroy all information collected from tracking collars placed on elk and wolves obtained illegally by landing a helicopter in a central Idaho wilderness area, a federal judge ordered Thursday.... |
Agenda from those not concerned about what is right.
|
Originally Posted by Champlain Islander
(Post 4291070)
Agenda from those not concerned about what is right.
|
From the article linked above. Was this a temp job for Kidoggy? :D
Idaho officials have previously targeted that population by sending in a state-hired hunter in 2014 that killed nine wolves. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/j...-data-44900609 |
Why throw away the data? It could be very useful and was already gathered. Yes, it is a wilderness area, and should be kept pristine, but, we do live in the 21 century, 50 years after the act they mentioned. I realize people that have do not live in areas where wolves have been reintroduced are not as concerned as folks who actually live in areas where they are. Many areas of Idaho and Montana along with Wyoming have a definite problem with wolf numbers. Yes, any motorized vehicle , land, water, is not allowed on the wilderness area, but I have a question, say a hiker becomes disabled in the Frank Church wilderness area, should a chopper be allowed to land and rescue him if he has life threatening injuries? That is a no brainer to me, would be mind boggling to me if that action was not permitted. Animals within a state are property of the state, and when those animals are introduced into an area by the federal government that puts a huge burden on the state, not just in elk numbers, but also agricultural issues with livestock and other concerns.
|
Originally Posted by mthusker
(Post 4291206)
Why throw away the data? It could be very useful and was already gathered. Yes, it is a wilderness area, and should be kept pristine, but, we do live in the 21 century, 50 years after the act they mentioned. I realize people that have do not live in areas where wolves have been reintroduced are not as concerned as folks who actually live in areas where they are. Many areas of Idaho and Montana along with Wyoming have a definite problem with wolf numbers. Yes, any motorized vehicle , land, water, is not allowed on the wilderness area, but I have a question, say a hiker becomes disabled in the Frank Church wilderness area, should a chopper be allowed to land and rescue him if he has life threatening injuries? That is a no brainer to me, would be mind boggling to me if that action was not permitted. Animals within a state are property of the state, and when those animals are introduced into an area by the federal government that puts a huge burden on the state, not just in elk numbers, but also agricultural issues with livestock and other concerns.
They'll have it saved somewhere on a disk at the home of a biologist or somewhere they can still use it and you can take that to the bank. You can also bet your butt if someone needs emergency help that they'll land a chopper with no questions asked. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.