Enough Gun ?
01-16-2013, 04:36 AM
#61
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in Vermont
Posts: 22,590
When I am hunting big game I take any shot that I can take in my judgment that has close to a 100% chance of success. My best situation is always a standing broadside shot when I have something to rest the gun on but in reality that situation isn't always present. While I have never attempted a head shot because I view that as low probability of success, I have used a neck or high shoulder shot when the yardage was right and that was all there would be for an opportunity. When still hunting or tracking deer which is the way I like to hunt a standing shot is what we all strive for but often you are faced with a running deer and just a few seconds to evaluate whether it is something you want to kill and if you can make a killing shot. As for the ethics vs legal debate I see a divide between the two. One is a personal benchmark and the other is a legal line in the sand.
01-16-2013, 05:13 AM
#62
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
Muley Hunter---Hope that things are gradually improving for ya. At our age it takes time and you just need to keep things in perspective, do what the Docs say and agree with me all the time, LOL!!!
Wilcam47---It looks like skinnnner needs to practice a little bit better reading comprehension on what you stated about the .223 and .243!
CI---Good post and one which I would hope most would agree with, especially the last couple lines and with that I see a certain member is still trying to get me going on that ethics front! He thinks people are terrible when we disagree with him and don't follow his philosophy of legal and ethical when there is most certainly a divide. In fact, that divide can sometimes be small and sometimes a chasm (ie. a guy like muley hunter that loves the "close in still hunter style" with a ML or the other that loves sniping an unsuspecting animal at 1000+ yards).
Wilcam47---It looks like skinnnner needs to practice a little bit better reading comprehension on what you stated about the .223 and .243!
CI---Good post and one which I would hope most would agree with, especially the last couple lines and with that I see a certain member is still trying to get me going on that ethics front! He thinks people are terrible when we disagree with him and don't follow his philosophy of legal and ethical when there is most certainly a divide. In fact, that divide can sometimes be small and sometimes a chasm (ie. a guy like muley hunter that loves the "close in still hunter style" with a ML or the other that loves sniping an unsuspecting animal at 1000+ yards).
Last edited by Topgun 3006; 01-16-2013 at 05:31 AM.
01-16-2013, 09:49 AM
#63
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Where animals get eaten
Posts: 671
When I am hunting big game I take any shot that I can take in my judgment that has close to a 100% chance of success. My best situation is always a standing broadside shot when I have something to rest the gun on but in reality that situation isn't always present. While I have never attempted a head shot because I view that as low probability of success, I have used a neck or high shoulder shot when the yardage was right and that was all there would be for an opportunity. When still hunting or tracking deer which is the way I like to hunt a standing shot is what we all strive for but often you are faced with a running deer and just a few seconds to evaluate whether it is something you want to kill and if you can make a killing shot. As for the ethics vs legal debate I see a divide between the two. One is a personal benchmark and the other is a legal line in the sand.
01-16-2013, 11:38 AM
#64
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 276
When I am hunting big game I take any shot that I can take in my judgment that has close to a 100% chance of success. My best situation is always a standing broadside shot when I have something to rest the gun on but in reality that situation isn't always present. While I have never attempted a head shot because I view that as low probability of success, I have used a neck or high shoulder shot when the yardage was right and that was all there would be for an opportunity. When still hunting or tracking deer which is the way I like to hunt a standing shot is what we all strive for but often you are faced with a running deer and just a few seconds to evaluate whether it is something you want to kill and if you can make a killing shot. As for the ethics vs legal debate I see a divide between the two. One is a personal benchmark and the other is a legal line in the sand.
As befor I say it is plenty.
01-19-2013, 04:12 PM
#65
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Where animals get eaten
Posts: 671
I dont see a shooting a running deer as unethical, shooting at a running deer whitout the skills, within distance, or clear shooting lanes then your getting into unethical. I shoot running animals within the peramiters above if any of thoughs i feel are not feasable then I hold my shot watch and start stalking again. But we are dragging this off topic and I say lets get back to is 308 Enough Gun? As befor I say it is plenty.
As befor I say it is plenty.
01-19-2013, 04:15 PM
#66
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Where animals get eaten
Posts: 671
I dont see a shooting a running deer as unethical, shooting at a running deer whitout the skills, within distance, or clear shooting lanes then your getting into unethical. I shoot running animals within the peramiters above if any of thoughs i feel are not feasable then I hold my shot watch and start stalking again. But we are dragging this off topic and I say lets get back to is 308 Enough Gun? As befor I say it is plenty.
As befor I say it is plenty.