Community
Big Game Hunting Moose, elk, mulies, caribou, bear, goats, and sheep are all covered here.

Side arm vs. Grizzley

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-02-2008, 10:42 PM
  #31  
Nontypical Buck
 
907Alaska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Central, Alaska
Posts: 1,774
Default RE: Side arm vs. Grizzley

Grizzly = shotgun/slugs, if the law permitted me to carry while bowhunting, glad we don't have to worry about them here in California & Arizona. We can't carry a sidearm or any arm here when hunting with a bow, in California or Arizona.
Pepper spraywould be alright for black bears...I would not be brave enough to try it on a grizzly.
907Alaska is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 09:09 PM
  #32  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location:
Posts: 9
Default RE: Side arm vs. Grizzley

A 44 mag has about the same energy as a 30-30. I think I would like a little bigger medicine when hunting griz, especially mad griz. That 500 Alaskan sounds like it might have the punch. A .450 guide gun would work too, but not so good as backup for a bow hunter. That little .22 short pistol might be the real answer...
danl1 is offline  
Old 03-04-2008, 12:42 PM
  #33  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 28
Default RE: Side arm vs. Grizzley

My son in Alaska tells me that most of the residents up there favor the 12 gauge "Defender" type shotgun over any of the handguns. However, he also tells me that alot of folks favor a handgun because they know they will carry it ALL OF THETIME and not leave it sitting in camp after the first few days afield. In terms of handgun caliber, he says just as many of them carry a Ruger Blackhawk in 45LC with +P loads as those that carry the 44Mag or something bigger. His recommendation to me when I came up to fish with him was to buy the biggest, badest, handgun that I knew I could and would practice with, alot. As he put it, a 454 Causull or 480 Ruger Alaskan isn't being overgunned with a griz,but any gun will get you killed if you can't hit him where it does the most good. That being said, I test fired a few of my freinds big handguns and decided upon the Blackhawk in 45LC with a good user friendly shoulder holster. I regularly shoot it with lighter loads because I enjoy it. That makes me extremely familiar and proficient with the firearm & the holster I have. But for the two months before I go to Alaska, I put in a weekly season at the range with the super hot "Bear Loads" for it. (O'Course, it makes me slightly more comfortable because I usually fish within eyesight of my boy who just happens to have his 12 gauge slung over his back 100% of the time.) (Also note, when I'm in camp up there, I am always wearing that pistol. When I go to the outhouse, or walk down to the creek to get a bucket of water, I borrow my Son's 12 gauge.)

Regards, & Good Huntin',
LlindeX
LlindeX is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:35 PM
  #34  
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scleicher County TX
Posts: 95
Default RE: Side arm vs. Grizzley

All that being said can you imagine walking around there back in the day when all you had was a muzzleloader.
highlonesome is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mbhntr04
Black Powder
6
02-12-2008 02:49 PM
Muliefever
Bowhunting Gear Review
4
03-20-2005 06:42 PM
hatchet jack
Traditional Archery
8
05-16-2004 06:35 PM
Surestrike
Guns
1
02-18-2002 07:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Side arm vs. Grizzley


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.