Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Classifieds > Automotive
Is there a pickup that gets 25-30 mpg? >

Is there a pickup that gets 25-30 mpg?

Automotive No hunter is complete without a hunting rig. Find all your automotive needs here.

Is there a pickup that gets 25-30 mpg?

Old 11-26-2013, 05:44 PM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,619
Default

my 3500 gets 16city/19 interstate, no tuner with 6 speed manual, that's running 55-60couple mph, run it 70-75 and it drops to 14

RR

Last edited by Ridge Runner; 11-26-2013 at 05:47 PM.
Ridge Runner is offline  
Old 12-03-2013, 12:25 AM
  #12  
Spike
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Memphis
Posts: 12
Default

That seems to be a nice truck.


Tevida

Tevida Price

Last edited by GailCrawford; 10-01-2018 at 01:25 AM.
GailCrawford is offline  
Old 12-08-2013, 05:14 AM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Eastern wv
Posts: 3,619
Default

the 2014 ram 1500 3.0l v6 eco-diesel is supposedly rated at 18city/25 highway. not sure if that's a 4x4 or 2wd.
RR
Ridge Runner is offline  
Old 12-08-2013, 05:59 AM
  #14  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 749
Default

2014 ford f150 3.7 v6 2wd gets est 17/32.
Bbj270 is offline  
Old 12-08-2013, 06:01 AM
  #15  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 749
Default

The ford 4x4 5.0 gets 14/19
Bbj270 is offline  
Old 12-17-2013, 12:55 PM
  #16  
MZS
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern WI
Posts: 853
Default

You will have to go with a smaller engine, smaller truck. And then you are driving a narrower high vehicle more prone to rolling than a full-size. Personally I like a hatchback type 4-banger car for work and a big 4x4 for the heavier duty. And I have taken the hatchback fishing and hunting too plenty of times as well as hauled 8ft 2x4's home in it. My 4x4 is a suburban - discussing its gas mileage makes me a little sad, although on a trip it can squeeze out 17MPG or even 18 on a good day - but it sure doubles well as a family "van" and wood/drywall/lumber hauler.
MZS is offline  
Old 12-22-2013, 07:52 AM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
Nomercy448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,898
Default

Our field engineers just upgraded from 2011 and 2012 F-150's to 2013 and 2014's this year, about half of the guys got Eco-Boosts (course of 27 guys, so around a dozen eco-boosts), EVERY ONE OF THEM has said they aren't getting any better mileage than their old trucks were. They're hitting 16-19mpg on highway (all we drive is highway, and we all keep track for reporting purposes). Supposedly, according to the dealerships, the Eco-boost doesn't start working for the first 20k miles (one dealership said 100k!!!! facepalm), so our guys tried to be patient with the trucks. After 50kmiles on a few of them with no improvement, we had 3 guys do warranty returns on their trucks because they thought something was wrong. 3 new Eco-boosts, same story, crappy mileage. This fleet is almost pure highway driving, most guys putting on 3000-5000 miles per month.

On the other hand, I had a 2010 Dodge Ram 4.7L that I got an honest AVERAGE 25mpg over 8mos. When I compared engine hours to miles driven during the lease, I averaged 72mph. Some tanks came out just over 28mpg. I'm the type that drives 7mph over the limit, so my interstate speeds were 77 or 82mph. Truck had ~20k on it when I picked it up, I turned in the lease at ~112k after 8months.
Nomercy448 is offline  
Old 12-22-2013, 08:00 AM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Nomercy448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,898
Default

Originally Posted by Bbj270
The ford 4x4 5.0 gets 14/19
Mine doesn't. I only have 20k miles on it, but I'm getting 16-17mpg highway. My 2010 and my 2012 got the same, over 200k and 180k lifespans for each respectively (both started tailing off a bit after ~165k, dropped down to around 14-15mpg by the time I upgraded). Commuted around Chicago for a few weeks this winter, been getting about 8mpg in town.

Sadly, my 1991 F-150 5.0L used to get 18mpg highway over a 480k mile life, and the 4x4 was WAY better than the new ones. Although she did start drinking about a quart of oil per tank by the end. My 1993 F-150 5.0 4x4 got 16-18mpg, but she threw a rod at ~230k miles, so that was the end of her. My 1997 5.0 F-150 had a lower geared rear end and 'ton and a half' suspension under the rear end, she didn't get as good, ~12-14mpg empty highway, but I rarely didn't have a trailer on it.
Nomercy448 is offline  
Old 01-09-2014, 12:46 PM
  #19  
Spike
 
trkytrack2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 97
Default

1992 Chevy S-10 Ext. Cab; 4x4; 4.3 Ltr. V-6 Standard 4-speed; 27 mpg. highway

1996 F-250 Ford 4x4; 7.5 ltr. auto trans. (you don't want to know mpg)
trkytrack2 is offline  
Old 01-10-2014, 10:06 PM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1,778
Default

Originally Posted by MZS
You will have to go with a smaller engine, smaller truck. And then you are driving a narrower high vehicle more prone to rolling than a full-size.

lmao
Tundra10 is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.