Look it up - compounds dominate archery season and have increased since they were allowed in. They "took over" archery season like nobody thought possible ! Do you deny that ? P&Y and G&F have to constantly tweak and ajust their "rules" to allow the latest and greatest want of compounders. Its true - like it or not.
That wasn't responding to my question at all.[&:]
Try again.
I never used "different user" as a username ! And if you HAD read enough of my stuff you'd know I'm all for all bows in archery season - I've said that for a very long time.
My bad!! Should have spelled it out.
S T E A L T H Y C A T It's really too bad our search function doesn't go back past one year. You know , back when the integrity of
archery season was your concern.
Minimal. The limbs don't do much of anything anymore - they can't, they're horizontal to each other and aren't very "bendy"
Then by golly, I shouldn't have to special order a set of 50-60lb limbs this year to accomodate my shoulder problems. They dont do anything anyway.
Burnie wrote....
With that said, I have seen this grip with anyone who is holier than thou, due to there rugged, manly persona. "I hunt X way, and you don't, you are not a real hunter". Now to say a traditionalist is much better than a compound shooter is crazy. I use both and both have there inherent problems. A compound is easier to hold and aim, but then again, if you practice right, a recurve and long bow are just as easy.
Not when you ask data. Put a compound in his hands and every critter within 40yds is dead meat. Hell , he's better than all of the hunting "pro's" who I've watched screw up a chance at a nice buck on video (with compounds) , even Randy Ulmer.[
]
Sarcasm aside , I agree with what you said there Burnie.