I think everyone does, but what everyone is pointing is that there is no evidence to back up the claims that Hybrids are superior. If they are superior then show me their domination in tournament archery, even local tournaments, and then I will agree with you. I mean even though top pros can win with anything, surely you would see them setting themselves a part in the "average Joe" ranks in local archery tournaments, wouldn't you? Or does it all boil down to the shooter? It's funny to see so many people spend so much time worrying about something that makes so little difference. Shoot something that is comfortable and that you have confidence in and the rest will take care of itself.