HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - If trajectory doesn't matter? 270 win vs. 308 win
Old 12-13-2015 | 01:50 PM
  #17  
Game Stalker
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: VA.
Default

Originally Posted by PigBrick
Never have seen a shooter or an animal that could tell the difference in a .270 vs .280.

OP, at reasonable ranges, there is no appreciable difference in a .270 and 308, as far as performance on game, when both are loaded with good bullets. I've used both extensively. I am a little bit partial to the 270 win. It was my first CF rifle cartridge and I have killed enough game to fill a couple of large dump trucks with it. Lately, I've been carrying a Kimber Montana in 308 @ ~6 lbs, all-up. Hiking steep and far certainly favors that rifle. It kills chit.

Bottom line is that the bullet shoved in the brass matters more than what is written on the base of that brass.
PB, that could be said about any number of cartridges. Like the previous noted calibers, it's an option for the OP that deserves mention. Seems most people, including yourself, have or had a favorite. I agree that it's the bullet that does the job.
Game Stalker is offline  
Reply