Originally Posted by HatchieLuvr

This is utter and complete "horsepuckey"!

This is a PRIME EXAMPLE of how much lawyers and bs court suits are making American co.s do things they wouldn't otherwise do or what necessarily is the right or fair thing to do? This decision is strictly a financial one based on fears and as a hedge against future (and certainly INCREASING) costs of future legal claims. Todays lawyers and courts just LOVE the publicity they get when they take on ANYTHING gun related, especially one of the "BIGS" like Rem. Rem is owned by a Wall St firm so it's suits and lawyers caving into more suits and lawyers! Nearly 8M units produced and we're talking about a comparatively small handful of supposed "defective accidents"? Again I say, BS! 8M units, over a half a century???

Would be interesting to know if this would've happend had DuPont still owned "big green"? The triggers in my 4 Rem boltguns (from 70s-00s vintage) will NOT be going back ANYWHERE except into my safe until the next time they are brought out for a hunt!

Terrible,

ps
And NO I'm NOT a "Green flag wavin Remophile"! I cuss Rem and the things they've done to their lineup and dealers since DuPont sold them many moons ago. Their baseline guns, across the board, are TERRIBLE today. But I hate to see one of the BIGS being treated like this by those on BOTH sides of this argument. In the end it's always the money, gatdam, stinkin money...