Frank, Len.. It doesn' t matter if Len was referring to my post or not. No matter how many smilies you stack on the end of comments like " real men" do this or that, or that ' some posts don' t belong" as a complete dismissal of a differing opinion, those comments are rude, immature and offensive.

But I do agree about the need for keeping up with the outer limits of bow design. Not out of interest - more like keeping an eye on the enemy.

Regardless of the shooting characteristics of the bow (and I have yet to hear either Len or sipeg talk about doing any 300/60X indoor rounds with one), the philosophical opposition that C903 raises is SPOT ON.

For me, this bow is an abomination that represents the end result of the influx of narcissistic ME generation types into archery. " To hell with ' the good of the sport' because it' s what " I" want that counts!" And the manufacturers are now happy to oblige with an attitude of ' To hell with the good of the sport, it' s the bottom line that counts." One thing for sure, things can' t get any worse. What? Mathews is going to come out with 99.2%? Hoyt with 99.3%? It would be funny if it weren' t so serious.