Wow! What a bummer. It is a shame that any manufacturer, especially one considered to be one of the "major" players in this market, would allow such a relatively easy to identify problem to go out the door. This seems like a fundmental point of a QA inspection to make sure that limbs are 100% perfect. Maybe that is too expensive a rate of QA or has proven that a "sampling" is adequate. But for sure in this case, the limb problem was not detected.