Originally Posted by
Omega45
You hit the nail on the head. It was a poorly designed copy job.
Yes sir it was, and you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned the fact that they didn't get it right as far as Bh209 is concerned. not only that, but i can remove and replace the BP in my Triumph 2- 2 1/2 in the same amount of time it takes to remove the CVA version..how do i know this? i helped a rookie M/L out and he owned a new wolf with a QRBP.. the wolf rifle functioned great for a low price rifle. the BP i didn't care for at all and neither did the OP when he tried the one on my Triumph. i hope all of the various M/L companys take a close look at the powder market and realize that BH 209 is here to stay! and design there BP'S so they ignite all BP subs with 100% reliability..this includes Knight !! Ray