MD it would be nice if those states did, but honestly i don't think it will happen.bottom line BH contains smokeless powder period. and that's what these states are finding out and why i think more will jump on the band wagon.is it good for the sport?" i don't think so".as i stated earlier i looked at Utahs regs, since i had tags for M/L season this past year. and it clearly states no nitrocellulose powder.even though it is classified as a M/L sub powder.this is how the heated arguments started.is it a approved M/L sub according to the feds? yes it has been. but individual states have the right to ban whatever they want.needless to say i didn't get to use my Utah tags,since i retained custody of my son in august and couldn't take him out of school.