Originally Posted by
UPHunter08
In your opinion. The definition of 'fair chase' is pretty subjective. Many non-hunters would argue that trail cams, high tech bows or rifles with scopes bring so much technology into the sport that it's no longer fair chase.

I'm not pro-baiting, for what it's worth, but I'm trying to bring a little proper perspective to this. I prefer to hunt over natural food sources where possible. I have better results that way.
Also, in my experience, baiting actually makes it
harder to score a mature buck, so in that aspect, your fair chase argument holds no water. If someone is baiting to shoot a doe or yearling, then yeah, I'll agree that it makes that a little easier. I also agree that hunters with access to only small tracts, they have little choice but to bait if the deer aren't naturally crossing the property. Not everyone has access to hundreds of acres of property or hunts near ag land. Who are we to deny them the right to hunt how they wish to as long as it's legal?
I too agree, for the most part, to each his own. However, this thread started by asking opinion's about baiting.
I see it as an ethical question, one that does not allow for the splitting of hairs hunting a buck versus hunting a doe or fawn for the freezer. They are all deer, and I just see it as an unethical practice, in other words cheating.