Originally Posted by
SouthernSportsman22
Thanks guys. The Leupold has fogged up multiple times and doesn't have good low light transmission. My previous Nikon Prostaff was much better than the Leupold and $129 cheaper. I really like the Nikon Monarch 2.5-10x42. Any thoughts on that particular scope?
Other than the fogging, my exact feeling on the Leupolds, I've had. I've not had them fog, but both did fail and quit holding zero. Leupold fixed it, but it still doesn't fix the fact that they did fail, and they had pretty crappy glass that was horrible in low light. I get bashed for posting it online, but it's the honest truth. My Simmons 8 Point had better low light transmission.