Originally Posted by
bigcountry
Interesting. Ok, for the 400-500 dollars you pay for a burris signature, you could get a Leupold.
Ok, lets separate the field here. Sure, the once a week rifle hunter, will be serviced fine with philp glass on a burris. No doubt. That the same hunter would do the same with a 200 dollar bushnell elite 3200 or even better served.
Why does burris feel the need for a posi-lok? With correct errector design, anybody in optics knows its not needed. And who is the manufacture so stupid to put a posilok on a target scope? I know.
How much errector movement can you get from from your signature (target turret) scope compared to a simular target turrent mounted loopy? I know the difference on comparitive 6.5-X loops and signature. I have had the both.
How far can you move the recticle on a signature before you start getting nonlinear results? I know on both leupolds and burris.
Lastly, I guarantee you, a person with a burris signature can't complete a optics box test and end up back to where they started. But I know for a fact I can on a M4. Or even a Vari-X 6.5-20 target.
wouldnt own a leupold again.had a vx1 and it was like looking into a bucket of mop water.wont spend anymore on their fancy models either.im planning on a vortex diamondback or a nikon buckmaster.and i do hunt more than a few times a year and its not a fancy pampered trip.do you hunt?maybe YOU can afford the fancy stuff,but putting down scopes because of a name or price isnt fair.and frankly i think your opinion sucks come on down to our budget then compare,infact come on to oregon and hunt on my budget,aint no fancy lodges or gun bearers,ya gotta do it yourself