So the point was and is, as it pertains to Btb and my conversation that if you dont support it, it doesnt really matter who the heck administers the shot. And pgc has decided on a prouse policy. I dont support it. Its an antihunter hotbutton topic and for good reason.
And this is different than a farmer spot lighting a deer in his fields inthe summer and tossing them over a hillside? or borough cops riding around with silenced rifles popping deer after the late seasons are done?
Sounds better me. If thats whats necessary... kill the deer and get them outta there. Shooting deer is an effective widely accepted method. Deer are usually given to programs to feed the hungry too. And if farmers are throwing deer over the hill, then arent they are breaking the law...and even if they werent, itd STILL be a better option imho than "contraception" which shouldnt even be an option.
I see shooting as far better option than pumping them full of some nasty concoction and have them roaming about with big orange spots painted on their sides. lmao. Just because pgc wants to cater to ANTI hunters demands. There is no need for contraception period. And it brings with it VERY ugly potential.
And thats just one issue. Another could be accurately pointed that pgc is VERY hunter nonfriendly as are their cohorts at dcnr. Their acceptance of this crap only shows this yet again. They cant be trusted with this option. And there is NOTHING that will stop its expansion of use thanks to the foot now being in the door. The delivery methods are being refined and the cost is being lessened. Absolutely nothing good will come of this from here on out yet there is GREAT potential maleffect to us and our sport and thats a fact. I also dont see this as good pr for pgc. More like INSANE. .
