Originally Posted by
bluebird2
That is your opinion but the PGC disagrees or they would still be issuing 52,000 doe tags instead of 26 ,000. If they didn't cut the allocations in half ,hunters would still be killing more deer than are recruited each year and future harvests would decrease.
You make no sense.The PGC reduced the allocation in 2G because the herd has been reduced.No one is aguing that there's less deer.What you fail to grasp is that just because there's less deer,it doesn't mean the hunting is poor.2G has vast areas with lousy habitat and therefore little reason for there to be alot of deer.I concentrate on areas where there should be more deer and I find them.Not everyone needs to see loads of deer without expending any effort.