This wouldnt be my first choice at all, but Im not closed to the idea Spurs, but would need to be alot of bugs worked out beforehand. Imho you'd almost have to have either a regime change at pgc or go straight to some other "nonindependent" system (like they have in most other states) and do away with pgc altogether to have any chance at all to work.

Id say perhaps a more agreeable solution to all involved, and one where we'd have absolutely TONS of money for game management and solve alot of our problems if pgc were to give up the management of nongame wildlife over to dcnr. Or at the very least have 2 branches of pgc one game, one nongame. Operating independant of each other One getting our cash. The other public funded. Both would be well funded well into the foreseeable future. Wed need a stipulation that we hunters would have a say in whos in management of the game branch, and we're high on the hog.. VERY simple. VERY effective.

But for cryin' out loud lets not just give more cash and forget there are any problems!! And thats exactly what will happen if legislators are permitted to wash their hands of all this for another decade, by giving that fee increase without proposed fixes.