No it isn't false and misleading.Deer browse.That's what they do.If there isn't alot of browse,it takes less deer to impact the browse that is present.It's ridiculous to claim otherwise.Yes,without a doubt there are other factors effecting regeneration.No one has never claimed there wasn't.It doesn't matter though.Poor habitat will support less deer.Less deer will have more of an impact on poor habitat.That's a fact,not a misleading claim.