How the PGC manages the herd has little to do with the success of any individual hunter.
That's especially amusing when one considers the hundreds of times you've posted your tales of woe about not seeing deer while trying to convince us that the PGC is doing it all wrong with all your warped "facts"
Quote:
Quite frankly, you routinely insult the intelligence of the readers here by constantly posting half truths, twisted facts and information taken out of context to further your agenda.
That also is a lie and you have yet to prove your false and misleading claims about the data I post. If you want to prove tha I am wrong , post the PGC data that shows reducing the herd has improved breeding rates and productivity and decreased the breeding window. You can't do it because it didn't happen ,which proves I am right and you are a liar.
Your distortions and twisting has been pointed out again and again and your only response is to continue to cling to that minscule decrease in breeding rates which was also explained to the satisfaction of the vast majority of members here.
You absolutely had a cow when it was pointed out that less than 15% of the does killed in the mortality study and you refused to accept the reality of those figures. Yes the question of whether or not hunters avoided tagged deer remains unanswered but that small percentage of hunter mortality tells a tale far more complex tale than "hunters may have avoided shooting tagged deer"
On the other hand, when RSB acknowledged the slight decrease in breeding rates and explained that there had also been a shift in the sampling emphasis to areas with traditionally lower breeding rates, you dismissed that and even tried to present an example using made up numbers.
As always, you dismiss hard facts and research results when they don't suit you and try to make mountains out of statistical mole hills when it suits your warped agenda.
Hoo Boy! I can see it coming..... The bird will respond with a deluge of misquotes and partial facts and end with the L word again
