No, I do not insult all PA hunters. I do insult those LIKE YOU who have adopted the mindset that their hunting successes or failures are more the PGC's responsibility than their own.
That is a flat out lie. How the PGC manages the herd has little to do with the success of any individual hunter. The debate is if the PGC is managing the herd based on the carrying capacity of the habitat or if they are managing the herd for the benefit of DCNR and the timber industry. The simple fact is that reducing the herd has not improved breeding rates or productivity and there hasn't been a significant increase in forest health,so based on the PGC's own data the plan has failed.
Quite frankly, you routinely insult the intelligence of the readers here by constantly posting half truths, twisted facts and information taken out of context to further your agenda.
That also is a lie and you have yet to prove your false and misleading claims about the data I post. If you want to prove tha I am wrong , post the PGC data that shows reducing the herd has improved breeding rates and productivity and decreased the breeding window. You can't do it because it didn't happen ,which proves I am right and you are a liar.