"Yes, Rodger the survey is 4 years old and yes it's a very small percentage of the hunters."

It wasnt worth the paper printed on. Names and numbers of pgc yesmen, provided by pgc to the poll takers. Pure b.s. Just like the upcoming sham audit. And just like Byron shissler the audubon and dcnr econut giving pgc the thumbs up as a supposed previous "critic" even though he helped develop the deer plan since he had been on the deer management team! LMAO!... Stay the course and tell the lies to back it. Thats the pgc mantra.

"You might well see a better approval rating if it were done again today"

Youd see worse because the herd is much smaller now than it even was then. And assuming an "unbiased" audit of real deer hunters, id say it'd probably match most of the internet polls that run 70-80% against the deer management plan reduction. Maybe even higher since in the real world, pgc employees dcnr guys etc. would be a much smaller percentage of the overall vote than they are on these websites... So I dont think 90%+ against would be out of the question. From what I see around here in the real world, its that high or higher.