"Do you read this stuff? '

Yep.

"an article from 5 years ago by 1 disgruntled woman hunter. The main website doesnt even exist today. "

Says FOR WOMEN BY WOMEN.. And she spoke of herself and HUNTING FRIENDS, SOME OF WHICH HAVE QUIT! (guess YOU dont read so well? LOL) But doenst matter, even if it were one, its one of many I provided and many more that I didnt. I could post each of the MANY THOUSANDS of articles and message board posts from the last few years, and it wouldnt matter one bit to you. As for the "main website no longer existing...Seems they didnt have a problem leaving up THAT page...LOL, Or maybe you think they are happier now that we have even fewer deer than we did then 5 years ago? LOL

"An article By Bob Frye promoting the Deer Wars book which you really ought to read by the way. Dissention is mentioned but nothing coming close to your claim of "lowest satisfaction rating in the nation"

Deer wars wasnt titled as such because bb and I were making all the noise. Or because of a few guys like usp. The state is pizzed. LMAO.

"An ACLU site...... Priceless!!! LMFAO!!!! "

Glad you liked it. Id say 100,000+ hunters "matter" and opinions count as much as any other hunters wether YOU agree with their views or not.

"An article about Unified Lawsuit LOL "

Again. Love em or hate em. More Hunters. The links arent only about usp or any other group, though I thought they should be at least included since they share the views of disgust about hr. Wether you or I agree with them about other things is immaterial in regard to this conversation.

"Actually, if you'd have read the article, you'd know that the author was supporting a license increase You really ought to have someone read this stuff to you! "

Yes. But he does so in spite of his distaste for the program.... AND that is the current topic of discussion. If you want to discuss the lack of support for a fee increase without change, that too can be and HAS been shown more than once.

"An article objecting to the use of sharpshooters in a park. The PGC only allows that where hunting not feasible. "

Ummm, sorry pal. Thats not all that was stated.

"LMFAOROTF!!! it's obvious that you didnt read this stuff
Here's a quote from that website.... "

Every word. And your desparate feeble attempts to disregard are humorous at best.


" Whitetail Deer often destroy vegetable gardens, fruit trees and crops. If their numbers become too high, the whitetail deer cause serious problems to forest plants. Deer are often involved in accidents with cars that result in serious injuries and deaths of humans. if someone posted that here you'd be among the first to scream econut! LOL! "

Ummm no i wouldnt. Those things are all undeniable facts. Id screamif those things were unreasonably used as an excuse for extremes in deer management...as pgc often does....But again, the "piece" speaks for itself.

And I wouldnt scream "econut" until mention was made of nonsense like birding, unnatural amounts of trillium, hobblebush, and not being able to see more than 50 yeards in mature forest as the goal[:'(]

"No doubt there is some dissent in PA "

Ha ha ha. Gee ya think? LMAO!!

"by a loud and persistent minority"

Nope. A helluva lot dont post on computers or write letters to the editor but are just as pissed if not moreso than those that do. I know probably 20 people who arent "politically active" for every one that is, that do not support the deer sham.

"that distrust but your claims of a majority and the ridiculous claim of a lowest rating in the nation is pure fantasy."

There is NO STATE IN THE NATION with a lower satisfaction rating of the deer managemnt. NOT ONE. There is no state even close to having as many p-oed hunters, no state that has anywhere NEAR the level of bad press, message board dissent, or anything else. Not even close. Not even debatable.