The "proof" you provided for that claim was no proof at all because you inserted your own assumptions that had no basis in fact. All who commented on it after the assumptions you inserted were pointed out agreed that your facts were not presented objectively and therefore incorrect. Since then you have claimed over and over that you "proved your point" All who saw it agreed that your "proof" was flawed but feel free to go ahead and try again.
Wrong again!! I provided the sample size data from the annual reports that was used to determine breeding rates and it showed that almost twice as many doe were sampled in 2B and 5C as in 2F and 2G. The southern tier counties with higher breeding rates still provide the highest percentage of does sampled ,just like before the statewide breeding rates decreased.