ORIGINAL: bluebird2
All you do is say they are lies, but you never produce anything that proves then wrong.
You claimed breeding rates declined by 5% because of a shift in sample size and distribution. I proved you were wrong and you provided nothing to support your opinion so there was no need for anyone else to prove you were wrong. You said buck harvests would return to normal and the harvest data proved that they didn't. therefore there was no need for anyone else to prove you were wrong. You said increased breeding rates would offset the negative effects of HR, but the deer proved you were wrong.
Now why don't you provide a list of the things that happened as you claimed they would.
The "proof" you provided for that claim was no proof at all because you inserted your own assumptions that had no basis in fact. All who commented on it after the assumptions you inserted were pointed out agreed that your facts were not presented objectively and therefore incorrect. Since then you have claimed over and over that you "proved your point" All who saw it agreed that your "proof" was flawed but feel free to go ahead and try again.