You claimed breeding rates declined by 5% because of a shift in sample size and distribution. I proved you were wrong and you provided nothing to support your opinion so there was no need for anyone else to prove you were wrong. You said buck harvests would return to normal and the harvest data proved that they didn't. therefore there was no need for anyone else to prove you were wrong. You said increased breeding rates would offset the negative effects of HR, but the deer proved you were wrong.

Now why don't you provide a list of the things that happened as you claimed they would.