The RIFLEman part of the association's title might give some subtle clue about where their priorities will leanin the course of supporting hunting rights.I would believe that the general opinion is that expanding areas where firearms can be used for hunting is good in terms of both gunrights and promoting hunting.It will likely be considered heresyin this forum, but there is likely a broader opinion thatpromotion ofthose two things ultimately trumpbowhunters' rights to atrophy buck. So, while I am not an NRA member andsometimes find myself rolling my eyes at some of their actions, I think that thiscurrent action is perfectly logical within the framework of their organizational priorites and the priorities of the broader huntingpopulation.