That is an easy one.
All across the state there are habitat variables that allow the various areas to support a different number of deer based on the differences in those habitats.
For one thing 2F has fewer steep rocky outcroppings where something can grow. Units like 2G could support more deer if things they could eat would grow on totally rock covered soil or if we could teach deer to survive by eating rocks.
Though both areas have about the maximum number of deer their individual habitats can support unit 2F inherently has better habitat types that will always support more deer then can be supported in the habitat types found in unit 2G.
You're normally pretty good at making excuses for this failed plan , but that excuse was hilarious. You and the PGC has been telling us that they are managing the herd based on forest health. In 2007 only 34% of the plots in 2F regenerated successfully while 42% regenerated successfully in 2G . Therefore the forest habitat is obviously better in 2G than in 2F. So, your easy answer turned out to be the wrong answer,as usual.