ORIGINAL: bluebird2
See thats where your lack of understanding of deer and their habitat shows. The browse supply is notlike a grain bin. Regeneration of the forest browse is not goingto double that fast even if your 50% numbers were supported by the facts which is also not the case.
Once again you demonstrated your total ignorance of habitat and deer management issues. If the habitat in an area supported 20 DPSM and 10 years later there are only 10 DPSM the habitat doesn't have to improve at all in order for the amount of food/deer to double. Simply cutting the herd in half doubles the available food supply.
One more time, Please supply the supporting documentation for your claim that the food supply has doubled or that the herd has been reduced by 50%.
I'm not about to provide any documentation for a clown that calls me a blXXjob!
Dodging the subject wont change the facts. You simply have nothing to back up what you say but your own warped opinion. To which you are entitled, by the way,warped ornot.
Why noy simply admit that it's merely your opinion and then there'd beno need for proof???