ORIGINAL: bluebird2
The present Commission has seen how failed to make that mistake though and instead seems to be set on doing what is right for the long term future of the resources. That too has become a major argument because hunters aren’t getting the attention to their way as they had grown accustomed.
Are you saying that reducing breeding rates, productivity and sustainable harvests are good for the long term future of the resource? How low would you like to see breeding rates drop before you are going to be happy with the results?
That has been explained to you several times in the past. You are hanging onto statewide data where there was a major shift in the breeding and reproduce data sample sizes between the best and worst areas of the state. That in turn made the statewide data inconclusive at best. But, since deer are managed on a unit bases instead of a statewide bases the statewide decline is immaterial, totally meaningless and not in indication of any declines in the individual management units.
You are just to opinionated and biased in your misguided agenda to accept the real facts. You truly and the other USP followers really are and long have been much of the very problem being discussed in this topic.
R.S. Bodenhorn