He has very few. I have as many or more. YOu have no proof of my knowledge level, my credentials or anything else. As for a "challenge" I challenge you to make one post that makes sense with no whining involved. This is getting tiresome.[:'(]
Sure you do
And myrefusal stands. You arent talkingto a kid, though Im starting to believe I may be. Yourlack of acceptance of the word "no" is reminiscent of my 6 yr old nephew when he wantscandy andasks every five minutes.
If you had any qualifications, I contend that you would proudly declare them. Your continued ducking of the question speaks volumes
You are wrong. I dont need proof. My posts speak for themselves. If the person making my posts were an unemployed vagrant, that wouldnt make them any less accurate. The facts are the facts. They prove themselves as posted.
I never thought you were an unemployed vagrant but you obviously don't work anywhere near any wildlife management entity and based on your posts, you probably have zero training in any of the biological sciences.
On second thought, ARE you an unemployed vagrant?
I have no obligation to you or anyone else. Its not in my best interests to divulge my "qualifications".
To steal a line from Larry "Now thats funny, I don't care who you are!"
Yes. I hear they are gonna fire the biologists since one of the wcos disagrees with their data of the last few years.[8D]
That one is a real gem! Obviously RSB agrees with the biologists. I can see that you're cofused. Maybe I can help. The only data RSB disputed was YOUR and Bluebirds spin on that data.