HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Lets Stop "A Slow Hit Is Better Than A Fast Miss"
Old 07-02-2008 | 09:19 PM
  #46  
TFOX's Avatar
TFOX
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,634
Likes: 0
From: HENDERSON KY USA
Default RE: Lets Stop "A Slow Hit Is Better Than A Fast Miss"

ORIGINAL: silentassassin

Arthur,

To me that just proves that you were the best shooter out there that day. I am sure you would have beat them with a speed bow if that's what you had been shooting. Speed and accuracy aren't mutually exclusive and shouldn't be classified as such. A good shooter is going to shoot a fast bow well and a slow bow well. The fast bows today are alot more forgiving than they use to be. I shoot a fast bow but I shoot apretty heavy arrow with so I am only shooting in the high 270's. But there are that shoot super fast rigs that can shoot circles around me and guys that shoot slow rigs that can shoot circles around me. At the end of the day it's alot about the jerk behind the string. It's not a good idea for most new shooters to start with a speed bow because they tend to be more difficult to shoot. Of course I have seen some newbies start out with excellent natural form that are the exception to the rule. But, the saying in question as no validity becuase it imples that fast bows aren't accurate. Sure a slow hit is better than a fast miss but a fast hit is better than a slow miss. Either way missing sucks and either way it is attributable to the shooter, not the bow.
I am staying out of this argument,most pretty much know my position and it seems a few are coming around but when I read this I had to stop and think about what the best archers in the world shoot for tournaments,and it ain't speed bows and most of them I know don't even use them to hunt with.
TFOX is offline  
Reply