ORIGINAL: Paul L Mohr
I agree with his thoughts, but not the way he communicated them. I could have done without all the name calling psychotic rambling. That sort of stuff does not help our cause. While we may find it amusing (I don't actually) the people that oppose us just see it as another nut ball with a gun wanting to keep his gun.
If they were to start taking guns away because of mental stability or lack there of I believe Ted would be high on the list.
I have said it before, I often times think he does more harm than he does good just because of the way he goes about it. That sort of talk is ok when you are around others that feel the same way as you do, but when your not you just look sort of crazy.
Anyone else see it this way, or am I alone on that one?
My opinion anyway.
Paul
Well put Paul.
Mythoughts exactly. Sometimes pushing too hard can do more harm than good. You have toknow your audienceand modify your thoughts in a way that gets your point across without being too aggressive toward your opponents.
That goes for any story, book, speech or seminar that you do regardless of the topic. As soon as you start name calling and such the people against you will feel attacked and automatically top listening to the message that you are trying to convey.