Is that the best you can do? Childish name calling? Try acting like a responsible individual rather than a wounded fawn. Your response is juvenile at best. Stick to the facts.

The numbers spoke for themselves. They will speak for themselves again. Lets see the figures! It's a fact that the agency suffered a loss of some 6% last year. Can they afford another 6% this year? Is it acceptable to the agency to hemorage 6% every year? Any business that operated under those conditions would soon be writing in the Red. OH! Yes, the agency IS writing in the Red. My, my, surprize surprize!

The agency is more interested in the propagation of fishers than in pheasants. How many hunters will pay for a license to go into the woods to observe a fisher as opposed to hunters who would buy a license and go hunt pheasants?
It appears the agency has their priorities mixed up.