RE: Global Warming impacts on Waterfowl
The glaciers are the "canaries in a coal mine" on this issue. What's happening is happening, the politics are in the reporting of what facts. It boils down tofiguring out who or what's to blame.
Is it the "fault" of buring fossil fuels? Sure more greehouse gas emissions into the atmosphere come from volcanos than engines. The question is, are the emissions from fossil fuels contributing to the problem?
To argue that loss of wetlands won't lead to lower watefowl populations (or lower populations of arctic & antarctic animals for that matter) is stupid and only serves to divert discusion away form the root of the problem.
Whatshould be done about it? That's the question that need to be addressed, and it's not an easy question to answer.
__________________
Days Full Of Clays...
NWTF, DU, SCI
|