logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Turkey Hunting

Turkey Hunting Whether it's spring or fall doesn't matter to this bunch. Great tips on calling, bustin flocks, using blinds and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-29-2006, 08:06 AM   #1
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12
Default Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

I keep reading these posts about people saying that they dont use 3 1/2" shells b/c they "Kick too much". The way I look at it is, that if I have a big old Longbeard strutting into my decoys, the last thing I am thinking about is how bad it is going to hurt when I pull th trigger. In fact every bird I have shot has been with a 3 1/2" shell and I can say that I dont even remember pulling the trigger let alone the kick.
River Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 09:44 AM   #2
Spike
 
jasuz61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berks Co., PA
Posts: 78
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

I agree.
__________________
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
jasuz61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 09:48 AM   #3
Nontypical Buck
 
DoubleLung55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Irwin PA USA
Posts: 1,229
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

Yea i agree , when you have that bird in im not thinking about the kick at all, and either way i dont usually plan on shooting more then one time lol but also i think deer rifles kick more then shotguns and sometimes people let loose with a volley of shots at one deer without complaints...
__________________
"Shots that are true....pass right through.."

"Doe meats better then NO meat!!!!"
DoubleLung55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 09:50 AM   #4
 
saltflat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 662
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

The reason I don't shoot 3.5 is because a 3" will kill any bird out to 40 yards. If I am not going to shoot any farther than that then why pay more money for more pellets. You can only kill a bird so dead. Plus the recoil might not be as bad or it might be worse, but when it comes to patterning it I don't want anymore recoil than I have to put up with. Anybody and everybody I have ever talked to boasts about how a 3.5 will knock you on your a$$ and it will make a man out of ya. I haven't ever shot a 3.5, but until my 3 quits killing turkeys I probably won't. I hope you guys on the forums don't think I am arguing with you. I am not and don't have any type of a problem with guys that shoot 3.5. I am all for anything that kills a turkey efficiently, but these are just some of my reasons for not shooting 3.5. Good luck this spring.
saltflat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 11:38 AM   #5
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bennettsville, SC
Posts: 542
Send a message via AIM to StrutnBPS Send a message via Yahoo to StrutnBPS
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

Quote:
ORIGINAL: River Hunter

I keep reading these posts about people saying that they dont use 3 1/2" shells b/c they "Kick too much". The way I look at it is, that if I have a big old Longbeard strutting into my decoys, the last thing I am thinking about is how bad it is going to hurt when I pull th trigger. In fact every bird I have shot has been with a 3 1/2" shell and I can say that I dont even remember pulling the trigger let alone the kick.
Amen Amen brother!

Its like some of them "look down" on hunters that use 3.5'' shells. I've NEVER felt the recoil of ANY gun while shooting at a deer, turkey, ducks, or anything else.

Shooting at paper you feel it more, but the 3.5''s aren't like a RPG like everyone says they are.

Like I said in the other thread. I bought a 3.5'' gun just to shoot 3.5'' shells. So, I am going to shoot them.

What really gets to me is some comments like "call them in closer". This is bs b/c just like i said in the other thread, I've never shot a turkey over 30-35 yards.

Yes, a 3'' shell will get the job done. But you know what? So will the old paper shells that my grandfather used to shoot when he was younger. So, why doesn't everyone just use them?
StrutnBPS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 12:59 PM   #6
 
saltflat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 662
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

They had paper shells, that is awesome. What type of a shotgun did they shoot those out of. Honestly I never knew they had such a thing.
saltflat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:09 PM   #7
Spike
 
jasuz61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berks Co., PA
Posts: 78
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

Quote:
ORIGINAL: saltflat

They had paper shells, that is awesome. What type of a shotgun did they shoot those out of. Honestly I never knew they had such a thing.
Yeah, right before plastic hulls, and if well maintained will shoot out of any modern gun of the same caliber. I have some of them but haven't tried shooting any. Some folks sell them for like 50 bucks a box as a collector's item. Do a search for vintage shotgun shells and you can get a look see.
__________________
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
jasuz61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:10 PM   #8
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,052
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

ALOT of guys who badmouth 3.5" guns are doing so because their wives won't let embuy a new gun and since they can't have one (and don't have their household in order) neither should anyone else!!!

Then another section of the population is "skeert" by a little ol 8# piece of steel and plastic. Imagine that a 200#, grown man being skeert of such a thing!!!

Being as I have yet to see "degrees of dead", I'd shoot a 5"er if they made it!!!
RA
RedAllison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:35 PM   #9
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Starlight, Indiana
Posts: 547
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

all hail the might 3.5. I ain't skeered and would dump all five if I had to.
TurkeyStalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2006, 01:48 PM   #10
JW
Super Moderator
 
JW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Racine, WI. USA
Posts: 4,410
Default RE: Why such a controversy over 3 1/2" shells

Hey I own both but have gone back to 3 inch.
Mainly because the 3" gun was better suited for turkeys due to size and weight. And I will never own a Mossberg - shot a few and those puppies kick more than any other 3.5 I have ever shot. Why beat the living crap outa yourself?

And to me the hype of 3.5 was to allow the hunter to take shots further than 40. You hear about it all the time. So if you never take shots further than 40 - Dead is dead whether a 3.5 or a 2 3/4 shell.


Same with the hype of Hevi-shot - Don't need it and won't pay for it! I am going to stick my copper plated buffered shells. They pattern just fine. With shots taken between 20 to 30 yards.

But each to their own!

JW
__________________
Turkey Hunting! ~ One Turkey Calling Another!
JW is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vegas controversy. MGH_PA Target Archery 1 02-09-2009 07:33 PM
Bow Controversy Huntinman23 Bowhunting 23 01-12-2009 12:46 PM
Pa doe tag controversy bowhunter2117 Northeast 49 11-25-2005 02:40 PM
Can we get some controversy here please... muley69 Bowhunting 1 10-21-2004 03:12 AM
Controversy !!!!!!!!!!!! chef#1 Bowhunting 39 06-05-2003 03:03 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:58 AM.