logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Traditional Archery

Traditional Archery Talk Trad-bows here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2009, 09:49 AM   #1
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 6
Default recurve ?

dug out my fathers old bow that he hunted with b4 ohio began its crossbow season.i haven't shot this bow since i was a teenager many moons ago lol
ok its ROOT GAME MASTER
marked #13696
G1
62''
56#
28''
does anybody know anything about this bow?
i shot it yesterday using 30'' #2216 alum arrow with razor back 5 heads. i was realy surpised at how well i shot this bow 4 not shooting a bow 4 25yrs.
mrtwister
mrtwister_jbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 07:07 AM   #2
Nontypical Buck
 
Talondale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,733
Default

Did a lookup and found this:
Quote:
Ernie Root, of Big Rapids, Michigan, was the bowyer. In later years, Shakespeare Archery bought him out and he went to work for them as head bowyer.
Most Roots were from the 60's and 70's. 56# is rather stout to start back into but I saw on your other post (no secrets on the NET) that you are a big guy and seem to be able to handle it. Post a picture of the bow please. That's a good hunting weight and if it's in good shape should be good to go.

Oh, just found a post on here from our own JRW:

Quote:
Ernie Root made his bows, to the best of my knowledge, from the early 50's to the late 60's/early 70's in Grand Rapids, MI. At some point around the late 60's he sold a number of his designs to Shakespear, who in turn slimmed them down and renamed them. For example: The Brush-Master became the Neceedah, and the Game-Master was altered into the Ocala and the Kaibab. The first bows of this type bore the name "Root, by Shakespear". Shortly thereafter Ernie root went to work for Shakespear, and the Root name was dropped completely. The Shakespears were servicable bows, but IMO not near the quality of the Roots, and I've owned examples of both.

His early bows were rather basic, but standard for the time--straight grips, narrow shelves, and plain woods. I've seen Game-Masters, Field-Masters, and Target-Masters in the early designs.

Around the early 60's his bows started to resemble what we now see in one-piece recurves, They had contoured grips, exotic woods, and more artistry in the higher-end models--the Game-Master and the Pendulus Supreme.

If your friend's Field-Master has a longbow-type grip and a slim riser, it's an early model. If the grip is more contoured--like a modern one-piece bow, then it's a 60's model.

Last edited by Talondale; 08-26-2009 at 07:10 AM.
Talondale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 12:37 PM   #3
Dominant Buck
 
burniegoeasily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 24,187
Default

Talondale is correct, I beleive. I am not real familure with his bows, other than the shakespear ones.

One of my favorite bows is a 1978 Herters Recurve. Ive taken a deer with it and loads of hogs, just about every year. I think I just might cry if something every happens to that bow. That is one thing I like about glass lam bows, they will last for ever.
__________________
kaafir mushrik

Unintended consequences and God have one thing in common: Liberals don’t believe in either of them.

J.F.K. hated liberals.
burniegoeasily is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 PM.