Seen this yet? New broadhead

Rangeball · 01-28-2008, 10:53 AM

300 grains.

Interesting

Schultzy · 01-28-2008, 11:08 AM

By the looks of it I wouldn't shoot it, too narrow of a cutting edge for me but it does look very durable. The picture could be deceiving though on the width of it so maybe its wider then I think.

Seif5034 · 01-28-2008, 11:19 AM

yeah, it does look pretty narrow (judging by the lines in the paper behind it)

PA Hardwoods · 01-28-2008, 11:36 AM

Hmmm Interesting. Wow 300 grains up front. I may like that, but as Schultzy said the cutting diameter looks narrow. But man that would get the old FOC up there

. I already have 250 grains of weight up front with my current setup. I think I would really love that 300 up there.

Matt / PA · 01-28-2008, 12:21 PM

I think the width might be a little deceiving.......it appears to be a 3 blade which means those blade edges you can see are tilted in a bit making it appear more narrow than it really is?

Mean looking thing regardless.

Rangeball · 01-28-2008, 12:27 PM

Matt is correct.

It's only a tad bit narrower than the Woodsman. Blade to blade appears narrow, but the cutting width is a tad bit over a 1" circle.

Saw this at tradgang, and apparantly they were at a booth at the kalamazoo trad show. To my knowledge, no web site yet and not available for 4-5 months, and then possibly in different weights.

Schultzy · 01-28-2008, 02:28 PM

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Rangeball

Matt is correct.

It's only a tad bit narrower than the Woodsman. Blade to blade appears narrow, but the cutting width is a tad bit over a 1" circle.

Saw this at tradgang, and apparantly they were at a booth at the kalamazoo trad show. To my knowledge, no web site yet and not available for 4-5 months, and then possibly in different weights.

1" is too narrow for my liking, thats one of the reason's I don't shoot the woodsman. Tough looking head though, its probably worth looking at