logo
 

Go Back   HuntingNet.com Forums > Archery Forums > Technical

Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2002, 03:41 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 520
Default SuperDoink-A-Sonic

This is just a small point.

I have been happily using carbon tube stabilizers with doinkers on the end for all my stab an vibe needs. The Shrewd stabs I have come with a doinker and aluminum end weight. The weight is is nicely finished, but the screw hole does not go through all the way, and allow one to mounts extras on the end of the weight. I did the obvious thing and drilled/taped a hole through it and now it wears one of those simms stabilizer mushroom things on the end. The combination of the rubber doinker, weight, and simms is just perfect for killing any vibes. Its working for me.
Ossage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2002, 10:08 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Default RE: SuperDoink-A-Sonic

Ossage,

I have a 4" Doinker on my MQ32 hunting bow. It works well as a vibration trap but it needs a little more weight to balance the bow. It has an threaded accessory hole in the end and I was thinking of putting on a Simms 'mushroom' on the end. Do you think I would get any additional vibration/noise dampening from this or would this fix just add more weight? Did your setup really become noticeably smoother when you added the mushroom?

The Mouse
__________________
HuntingNet Member since Spring 2001
The Mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2002, 01:42 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 520
Default RE: SuperDoink-A-Sonic

I think it helps a little, but my bow isn't objectionable to start with. The Simms is a very much softer rubber, and the combination seems to be like an anti-woofer and tweeter: one sucks up the highs and the other sucks up the lows. The simms adds a lot of weight in the context of a 1oz aluminum weight, but it is all synthetic, and doesn't add much real weight. In my case it however doubles the weight roughly, and more than doubles the length ahead of the doinker.
Ossage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2002, 01:46 AM   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 520
Default RE: SuperDoink-A-Sonic

My bow in the above case is a Mathews C2.

I am also experimenting with putting a heavy weight in the bottom and a light weight on top. Until now I have just used both heavy weights. I hope this will: Lighten the bow slightly; bias the bottom to help keep the bow verticaly aligned; kill different sound ranges on the woofer tweeter basis; and give me an identical heavy light set of dampers in reserve. Have you played with that?
Ossage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2002, 09:29 PM   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Default RE: SuperDoink-A-Sonic

Thanks for the tips and the info, Ossage. My MQ32 is from the generation of bows before the harmonic dampeners came out on the Q2, SQ2, Conqest 2, etc. so I don't get to play around with those shiny pieces of metal! Your idea has merit, putting the heavy brass dampener on the bottom and the light aluminum one on top.

The Mouse
__________________
HuntingNet Member since Spring 2001
The Mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sonic 300 jenningssonic300 Technical 0 11-24-2008 05:23 PM
SONIC PRO DeerStalker80 Bowhunting Gear Review 2 11-06-2007 04:02 PM
Sonic broadheads goherd1111 Bowhunting 6 09-21-2006 07:50 PM
sonic vs. trick cartman308 Technical 8 09-02-2006 06:56 AM
Sonic Broadheads? muzzy chucker Bowhunting 3 08-23-2006 05:39 PM

 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 PM.