Quote:
ORIGINAL: Rangeball
Jeff, I looked at those briefly while on Easton' s site yesterday. I assumed, possibly incorrectly, that because they were still all carbon, they would potentially be susceptible to spine degradation similar to other all carbon shafts.
Is there something inherent in this new shaft that solves that issue?
|
Well, not that I know of. But I' m willing to give them a try assuming the cost is reasonable. The HIT component system and small diameter are what intrigues me...especially after spending over an hour a few weeks back experimenting with some of my all-carbons trying to get a good spin with broadheads. 6 brand new arrows, 12 inserts, 3 brand new broadheads and I could only get good concentricty on
ONE arrow out of the whole lot of shafts and components. That' s really sad.
The HIT system should help to eliminate that problem. If the shafts spine consistently (they should being Easton), and the straightness is decent (iffy w/ Easton all carbons)...this could turn out to be a phenomenal hunting arrow. Assuming of course spine does not degrade as fast as current IC technology.
Outta my 80 pound Liberty those things should get a pass-through on a 351 Cleveland!


[:-]